pwdisswordfish0

9 ms·

1.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
> Of course they haven't. Of course they haven't what? > "this is not really true" and "all chrome-only proprietary APIs were dropped" First of all, that's insane, but secondly, no one is even claimi
2.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
1. Dodging the question with non-answers that conflate unlisted repos and better account privacy settings with the stuff that is known to be forbidden on Codeberg does no one any favors. It is no surprise that repos for non-free software a
3.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
I've read that. It doesn't say or even suggest anything like what we're actually talking about here. Someone pointing to those terms in the TOS is either confused about what this discussion is about, confused about what exa
4.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Two questions: 1. What can you point to that explains or even suggests that repos "should [...] be findable" directly on codeberg.org and for "people browsing [it] and pages within"? E.g. that creating an unlisted repo
5.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
It took a long time, but GitHub has finally (thankfully) shipped privacy settings that allow you to disable the way it broadcasts/publicizes your every move on your profile page. Does Codeberg or Gitea allow this yet? (They really
6.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
> You "counterpoint" isn't even a counterpoint, but just reinforces the original comment. This sleight of hand is not going to work. > Literally not a standard shipped in Chrome, literally is something Chrome came up wi
7.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
I sometimes fear I shouldn’t play driving games too much, so that I don’t get desensitised against those intrusive thoughts I sometimes get on the road. I wonder how irrational that actually is, because it feels like pretty much the same th
8.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Sorry, try again. That's not how proof-by-contradiction works. > This is 100% true. It literally is not, unless you think 100% means "less than 100%".
9.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
This is not really true. Chrome's extensions to the Web platform comprising its Page Lifecycle APIs are coherent, well-reasoned, and valuable/inoffensive, yet other browsers have not implemented them (yet; but the proposed APIs a
10.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Mozilla has been behaving the way it's been heaving lately for the last 10 years.
11.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
That doesn't make any sense.
12.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
> 52 bits because of javascript But IEEE 754 doubles have a significand that supports a 53-bit range. What am I missing?
13.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Context is important. The replied-to comment starts off, "While this particular implementation doesn't track individuals, couldn't your trivially start tracking individuals by[...]" An acceptable response, then (to bo
14.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Only if you disregard the amount of latitude that the semantics of these headers give to UAs that would effectively thwart this method of tracking. If I fetch your /foo.html today in November 2022, and you send me a last-modified from
15.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Would you be open to using an apostrophe ’ in your header instead of the straight single quote? I dig the Comic Sans, but it would look so much better. Cheers lol
16.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
I did watch the video, iirc he literally says “is this client-side state I have to worry about? No.” multiple times. When the user changes something that affects the UI in multiple places, all the necessary fragments are fetched from the se
17.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Well, sure, the value of an input is in its value property, but you build your stuff in such a way that you don’t access it unless you absolutely have to.
18.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
There is no client-side state, that’s the whole point.
19.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
> They offer higher wages than competitors Do they? Ten years ago Walmart distribution center workers were making what the writer says he made at Amazon, which is itself surely the result of recent increases. No idea what Walmart pays
20.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Airships would seem to excel, then, for short trips where you need lots of lift. Within the same city, for example.
21.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
The instructions provided in the README (about manually bookmarking a bookmarklet link) reflects the careful process that has to be followed to use bookmarklets on mobile browsers. The instructions to drag and drop this bookmarklet (or e
22.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
The bookmarked URL is under the control of your browser. Could you provide more detail?
23.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
It's "stationery".
24.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Here's an excellent series where in a 2003 interview, Anders Hejlsberg discusses lots of these types of things and more. < https://www.artima.com/intv/anders.html >
25.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
Good luck shipping a machine in 2022 that either (a) doesn't have a Web browser, or (b) has some way to ensure the code it's running is not from a site where the user wrote all (or even just some) of it
26.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
> VS [...] has one real competitor - JB Rider There is one other non-VS, non-Rider alternative: Visual Studio for Mac.
27.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
It makes a lot of sense. We have Godot submissions all the time. Someone submitted one for a v4 alpha. (That it didn't get traction is irrelevant.) Here's one for the beta. When v4 is released, it'll inevitably be posted he
28.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
> this is a colossal release It isn't. It's (yet another) pre-release. There's a story about an upcoming Godot release posted every 1, 2, 3 weeks or so.
29.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
> when I hear a hipster who's lived here for 2 years try to inject jawn into every conversation. Feels very forced. Same thing happens with "y'all", even though it's nowhere close to being as esoteric/region
30.
by pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
It would be nice if we brought the rule back where it's against HN guidelines to post submissions for every new version of some software. Every Godot thread ends up with the same comments posted, none of them particularly interesting

More ›