pvg

29 ms·

361.
by pvg 1y ago
You can just pad or HMAC the short sentence.
362.
by pvg 1y ago
If you write something super short someone could guess the hash for it. You can skip the pdf and unless the thing is so short/predictable you can guess it outright, nobody is going to 'guess' the hash. E.g. 'I made up
363.
by pvg 1y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44009999
364.
by pvg 1y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43676697
365.
by pvg 1y ago
Things like that don't get flagged out of Muskfandom.
366.
by pvg 1y ago
I'd skip the level of indirection and just add an 'amichail asks' section.
367.
by pvg 1y ago
Oh I'm definitely not arguing with you over what license you ought to have on your own project for your own reasons. You want a zany license, let your freak flag fly!
368.
by pvg 1y ago
Ongoing discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44006345
369.
by pvg 1y ago
You should absolutely use whatever license you want but the actual price tag a nonstandard license adds is 'far fewer people will be able to try or contribute to your project'. Which might be totally ok for your purposes, just poi
370.
by pvg 1y ago
The paper had an HN thread a few months ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42115310
371.
by pvg 1y ago
You should mail such questions to hn@ycombinator.com
372.
by pvg 1y ago
Thread recently https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43482705
373.
by pvg 1y ago
Ongoing discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43996307
374.
by pvg 1y ago
Same with Hypercard, perhaps even more so since Hypercard let you respond to UI gestures the standard UI didn't really use like mouseovers.
375.
by pvg 1y ago
It's not particularly funny and generated comments are discouraged on HN https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
376.
by pvg 1y ago
https://archive.is/1jnLk
377.
by pvg 1y ago
You could turn this into a Show HN post which will probably get better feedback - take a look at https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
378.
by pvg 1y ago
Thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43994545
379.
by pvg 1y ago
thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43987266
380.
by pvg 1y ago
'Musk fiddles with twitter to match his weird views' is a very repetitive story that's been on HN a bunch, including recently so I guess I don't see the interestingness in this case. The 'attack' thing is your
381.
by pvg 1y ago
Some miss old handy tools, others miss the old gatekeeping.
382.
by pvg 1y ago
I'm not having trouble parsing it, I'm asking what would make this an interesting HN post.
383.
by pvg 1y ago
Yes they are more applike than UI-definition-like.
384.
by pvg 1y ago
It still doesn't seem very interesting, even assuming the theory is right. Like, what's the interesting conversation you envision would happen here?
385.
by pvg 1y ago
Is your project public?
386.
by pvg 1y ago
I don't think it's unreasonable to apply the same remedy to all AI companies. A court can't really formulate and enact such a remedy. all public transit information Not all entities are public and we have more readily ava
387.
by pvg 1y ago
I'm not talking about the merits of YC's brief, just the merits of the comment I'm replying to. "Why shouldn't we apply the proposed remedy for illegal behaviour on everyone" seems like a no-brainer to me.
388.
by pvg 1y ago
Pay to play is a really broad term (just skim the wikipedia page) and describing it as 'inherently anticompetitive' isn't saying much. There are also plenty of political, social and business arrangements that are deliberately
389.
by pvg 1y ago
How is it more like that? This is a proposed remedy for breaking the law. Driving on the road (tll or free) is not breaking the law. There is no 'like' about it at all.
390.
by pvg 1y ago
Because all companies haven't been found to be illegal monopolies? Just like we don't fine everyone with a car for speeding.

More ›