3 ms·
I'm not having trouble parsing it, I'm asking what would make this an interesting HN post.
by pvg 1y ago
I'm not having trouble parsing it, I'm asking what would make this an interesting HN post.
- sanderjd 1y agoIt looks like the system prompt may have been modified, or that it may be some kind of attack on the system prompt, or possibly someone attacking the training data, or it may be totally organic somehow, in which case it's still interesting how topics can leak into responses to unrelated questions. These are all interesting topics for the crowd on HN to weigh in on. If I searched for some arbitrary thing on Google right now and the AI generated results gave me a bunch of unrelated slop about South Africa, we would certainly be discussing how that might have happened. This is no different.
- pvg 1y ago'Musk fiddles with twitter to match his weird views' is a very repetitive story that's been on HN a bunch, including recently so I guess I don't see the interestingness in this case. The 'attack' thing is your gloss, I don't see it appearing in any of the reporting.
- sanderjd 1y agoA story that I think is clearly worth discussing on HN is "what seems to have happened with grok here?". Musk fiddling with the system prompt is only one of the possibilities. People here can make arguments for or against that theory or others. But also, it's news worth discussing on a technology news discussion site if the owner of one of the largest technology platforms by reach is manipulating the information on that platform in a new way, even if there have been lots of other discussions about them manipulating things in other ways. Notably, I think the only uninteresting threads here are the ones like this one that are questioning why this is news. Yawn.
- craftsman 1y agoI'm guessing that your view aligns with the theory that novelty is one of the more important measures of a HN post. In other words, a topic that "is a very repetitive story that's been on HN a bunch" is not novel, so is less valuable on HN. In any case, whether that is your view or not (sorry if I misinterpreted you), I think this is too narrow a view. A topic can be one that has been on HN a lot, but still be novel, interesting, fresh if the new story has some different twist or nuance to it. Also, not everyone reads HN to the same degree, so what is "very repetitive" to one set of readers may not be to another. I know that some users flag certain posts (and mods do not subsequently unflag them, even on appeal) because of their perception of a post's lack of novelty, but this seems overly censorial when these users could skip reading it, not upvote it, etc.
- jrflowers 1y ago> I'm not having trouble parsing it It seems like you might be. Several people have shared their opinions on this topic, some directly to you, and in your other posts you insist that this shouldn’t be on this website because you, user pvg, does not want to see it. The issue to parse here is that this wasn’t emailed to you, it is a discussion on a public forum that you clicked on and posted in several times. I would also be very confused if I thought I was being forced to read things on this website against my will.