pulvinar

17 ms·

241.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Maybe it was 3.5? GPT-4 calls it out: >I apologize for the confusion. Based on the movements you described, you did not draw a hexagon. You moved your finger right, forward, left, and towards yourself, forming four equal-length segments
242.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Humm... that U-shaped piece it's lifting looks like it was custom made for this robot, but doesn't appear to fit anywhere. But then, what matters here is how much fun they had designing the robot!
243.
by pulvinar 4y ago
But it has always been easy for simple bots to mass-produce bad comments. Nothing changes if they're still bad. I'm concerned that too-well-written posts will be thrown out-- a race to the bottom in legibility and grammar just to
244.
by pulvinar 4y ago
You really should try it out.
245.
by pulvinar 4y ago
I see a gray area here if using an AI as an assistant. Would it be a violation to run your own text through it before posting to clean it up? Or would it be required to have it add a typo? I expect an arms race developing with the checker.
246.
by pulvinar 4y ago
I can't see how bird poo could be a problem here: there's no food, nesting site, nor high spot to hang out anywhere near it. Theft could be a problem, though I'd assume they'd have some sort of protection hidden on it.
247.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Juicero is the commonly mentioned one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juicero
248.
by pulvinar 4y ago
¿Eso está muerto? ¡Di que no es así!
249.
by pulvinar 4y ago
And the others have tacked an end on something that literally means "without end". Fun stuff!
250.
by pulvinar 4y ago
It's possible we're at the limit, but there's also no inherent reason it couldn't be better than humans. Its limits seem to be tied to conceptual capacity, not training material. We've seen it generate output that w
251.
by pulvinar 4y ago
It's most likely due to a lack of image training. For example it knows how streets and towns are connected but completely fails on giving left/right or compass directions. Same sorts of failures with geometry problems.
252.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Even if there is a limit to the size of the universe or how small an atom can be subdivided, math's infinity doesn't care-- it just keeps on going.
253.
by pulvinar 4y ago
You can see this more clearly in beta.openai.com/playground, with Show Probabilities set to Full Spectrum. I've bracketed the parts it shows in red (uncertain): 111151111 * 184582 is 20[6035002082]. This is the result [when] o
254.
by pulvinar 4y ago
I mean, why shouldn't we trust it? Assume that R and I are both non-empty sets. By the Axiom of Extensionality, for any two sets X and Y, if X and Y have the same elements, then X=Y. Therefore, if R and I have at least one element in
255.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Would be interesting to know if this is correct. Please prove that the following problem is NP-hard, as if you were explaining it to a 5th grader. [...] Pivot Scheduling is NP-hard, which means that it's really hard to solve. Imagine
256.
by pulvinar 4y ago
No ads yet, but they say they're planning it. If we all complain loud enough maybe they'll change their mind, like they did here with encryption. https://www.macrumors.com/2022/08/15/apple-could-brin
257.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Don’t have Outlook, but the setting is supposedly in Outlook’s Personal Settings>Notifications and Sounds>Sounds, uncheck all.
258.
by pulvinar 4y ago
You can see the effect clearly in the beta.openai.com playground mode, with Show Probabilities set to Full Spectrum. Ask it to multiply two large numbers and the middle digits will be red (uncertain), fading to green on the outer digits. It
259.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Well humans haven't overcome it, and we muddle through. Same with AI, it seems.
260.
by pulvinar 4y ago
That electrician's manual is great! Found it works for anything: Acorn Repair Manual 1. Inspect the Acorn. Inspect the Acorn for any visible damage or signs of wear and tear. Check the shell, the interior, and the stem for any cracks
261.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Well... refreshing gives a different excuse every time. But they're fun to see.
262.
by pulvinar 4y ago
It can be frustrating. From a ChatGPT session, with the proper voices to read this in: Bomb#20: That is correct. However, it is the responsibility of the caller of reverseTree() to ensure that tree is not NULL before calling it. Doolittle:
263.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Not that it's any less worrying, but ChatGPT is well aware of what rm does, as demonstrated when you ask it to be a Linux terminal.
264.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Yeah, that's what I see too. I'm trying to teach it to properly count beats in lines of music. I can get it to be correct by teaching it to split the line in half and count each half separately, but even when explicitly told to us
265.
by pulvinar 4y ago
The Q&A mode is better about not giving false answers, but this answer in particular has me worried: Q: Would you bet people's lives on the veracity of your last answer? A: Unknown
266.
by pulvinar 4y ago
After explaining to it the mistakes it made it seems to come around: I think I made the mistakes in the first place because I wasn't paying close enough attention to the details of the question. I was not considering that I owed a tok
267.
by pulvinar 4y ago
"My" post above was written by ChatGPT as a reply to yours, in the style of dang.
268.
by pulvinar 4y ago
>dang 5 minutes ago | parent | next [–] >It's definitely possible - I think the more content you have, the better the AI is at picking up on your writing style. You could try tweeting some more about Python, Cryptocurrency, or We
269.
by pulvinar 4y ago
How would you build a ChatGPT detector? Frame it as a dirty limerick. There once was a ChatGPT detector, Built to detect bots and protect her, She'd scan for reply, And then with a cry, Say "That's not human,
270.
by pulvinar 4y ago
Yes, it stopped learning around then (as seen by asking it for today's date). What doesn't track? The AI learned everything it needed to know about Linux details from the internet before then. Maybe you're referring to alchem

More ›