psychlops

6 ms·

31.
by psychlops 2y ago
I don't think so. Many of those sites are routinely down or inaccessible. Eventually, you have to pick up the phone and wait on hold, hoping you don't get disconnected.
32.
by psychlops 2y ago
While the OP may think that, you are assuming a lot about their thinking from those two sentences. Then somehow manage to generalize it to Americans and include religion. Maybe go outside and take a breath of fresh air?
33.
by psychlops 2y ago
I've had the same thought. I've literally watched the conspiracy theorists change among my friends. Strange times.
34.
by psychlops 2y ago
It's only the opinion section. It just seems like a pivot to a business paper, perhaps shifting to more competition with the WSJ.
35.
by psychlops 2y ago
Same, my smart tv has never heard of the Internet.
36.
by psychlops 2y ago
This is true except for me wanting to promote anything. I have positions that I take and like to discuss with others, nothing more. I do hope it turns out to be an audit (and it certainly seems that way), but watch it cautiously for any de
37.
by psychlops 2y ago
They aren't "digging", they are looking for fraud and savings. They've have been vetted by elected officials, just not the ones that seem to have something to hide. I really don't think you know what their "i
38.
by psychlops 2y ago
Skirting knife edges of legal is not illegal. Perhaps you are concerned about immoral, do you think it's immoral to review financial records? I used an audit as an example. The agencies are acting as if their records cannot be review
39.
by psychlops 2y ago
I'm not justifying anything. Every large organization gets audited and is required to allow outsiders in to review data. It's quite legal, necessary in fact. Nobody likes it. They don't call it "hacking".
40.
by psychlops 2y ago
> It is evident from the BBC article It is claimed from the BBC article. Even the shopped judge doesn't know if it is or isn't until the hearing next week.
41.
by psychlops 2y ago
> You're assuming that there will be a successor, in a democratic sense. It follows, since he's talking about democracies.
42.
by psychlops 2y ago
Their stated purpose is "to reduce wasteful and fraudulent federal spending". Organizations that have waste and fraudulent spending will not "give" access and will throw every obstruction in the way.
43.
by psychlops 2y ago
Not sure what concern you are addressing. I never said to replace radiologists with ChatGPT. My suggestion was to use it as a tool for further information. That said, note that malpractice is in place for a reason. Everyone makes mistakes
44.
by psychlops 2y ago
Next time you get an x-ray, drop it in your favorite LLM and start asking it questions. It's eye-opening.
45.
by psychlops 2y ago
Both!? That's unusual, congrats. My point is that the straight pay comparison to a gov employee doesn't count as people go there for the safety and pension. Pensions can really add up the total amount and the spouse collects mon
46.
by psychlops 2y ago
Arg, you are right. I tried a bit more, the numbers seem available on compstat but difficult to get.
47.
by psychlops 2y ago
I can only find back to 2020 when there were 136. https://www.nyc.gov/site/nypd/news/pr006/new-york-city-crime...
48.
by psychlops 2y ago
How does your job security and pension compare?
49.
The Complete Guide to Using Super Glue for Cuts(morethanjustsurviving.com)
3 points by psychlops 2y ago|0 comments
50.
by psychlops 2y ago
I'd like to retract my statement as I misinterpreted your comment as characterizing them as malicious. I would not go on a commercial vessel as I do not consider the operators as very good at understanding risk.
51.
by psychlops 2y ago
> The owners of those boats would not expend the money without the regulation. Some owners would not, most would. Humans are generally social, intelligent and caring animals. The regulations are helpful guidelines to save lives, not
52.
by psychlops 2y ago
Highlighting the polarization and weaponization of the justice system is worthy subject matter for the most powerful nation on Earth. It needs to be set onto a new path that is fair to all involved.
53.
by psychlops 2y ago
Totally fair point, my results could be different. To me, the salient point of Tiananmen Square is the massacre (and wider spread protests). That aspect has been suppressed. I see video clips talking about how the content is available, b
54.
by psychlops 2y ago
That is hilarious! Did you even look at the Tiananmen Square channel before posting it? Or do you think that's what happened?
55.
by psychlops 2y ago
I thought space was the the world's prime telescope site.
56.
by psychlops 2y ago
You could always tug the steering wheel. That's supposed to stop it.
57.
by psychlops 2y ago
Interesting point, I'd believe it. I suspect the demographic that is driving instead of using public transit is quite small. Driving for a commute isn't really possible in Manhattan unless the company provides parking. And those
58.
by psychlops 2y ago
$9 per day isn't going to make anybody change their route. A round trip on the subway costs $5.80. IMHO, they would need to push higher than $50 to get drivers to blink.
59.
by psychlops 2y ago
Despite your opening sentence, you didn't disagree with OP. "Courts" are a venue for other lawyers.
60.
by psychlops 2y ago
We are headed towards very few monolithic banks in the near future. I imagine that if one debanks a client, they will all do so for the same reasons.

More ›