Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pseut
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
54 ms
·
571.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
> Bring more structure than linear comments, but less complexity than threaded comments. Definitely. I basically want a forum that looks like gitk (but flipped, obviously). Clear replies, multiple parents, but sorted chronologically a
572.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
Just noticed that the title's been changed since my comment.
573.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
I jail broke for "protect my privacy" and shell access. Way better than sbsettings
574.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
The link title's more than a little misleading: the material is supposedly "breathable," "human," and "skin-like". (Adding a hyphen to make it "human-skin-like," which I assume is what was intended, isn't much better). From that descr
575.
▲
Visualization of Super Bowl score over time (individual tweet)
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
pseut
14y ago
|
0 comments
576.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
>Why teach a man how to fish when you can keep selling him the fish? If you think someone is going to come along to teach fishing anyway.
577.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
Not quite true; papers in many fields are available as working papers that get updated and I've frequently seen papers that cite each other.
578.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
"Disrupt[ing] the scientific journal industry" is a massively ambitious goal. Good luck! I'd really like to know more about startups that are trying a less ambitious first step; something like "wordpress for marine biologists who want to
579.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
> The reason scientists don't blog a lot, or comment on blogs, is that... So, now that I've read the comments on a few of these open-access type articles, it seems like there is so much variation among academic disciplines that broad st
580.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
> The primary metric is citations. What field are you in? This is absolutely wrong for tenure decisions in economics. It is pretty wrong for promotion from associate to full professor.
581.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
>The fact that papers you are looking for tend to be available on author's webpages is atypical. A very small percentage of the 2 million papers published each year is available online for free. I'd love to see data on this, so I can se
582.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
Whose theory are you describing in the first paragraph? Yours? In practice, the needs of society -- new freely available knowledge -- match up imperfectly with the needs of the people who can or should do the research: money, recognition
583.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
This doesn't affect your argument at all, but academics are sometimes paid a small amount to edit journals; not enough though (AFAIK) to affect their decisionmaking.
584.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
Yeah, the casual suggestion that MIT should try to badly damage the careers of most of its faculty (presumably causing them to leave) suggests that he hasn't thought about this problem very long or talked about it with many people. As much
585.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
You could do prior probability conditional on not being available on a US keyboard, or at least make that an option. edit: just read your comment elsewhere on the page indicating that you do something like what I described.
586.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
What would be an improvement? I type tar from the command line so infrequently that I don't think anything would be particularly easy to remember. Spending the 5 minutes to get it right in a script isn't a big deal. tar --help is
587.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
Just as a comment to any current students who do experience the death or illness of a relative: it's probably best to discuss things with your academic advisor (grad or undergrad) before or instead of contacting individual professors. An e
588.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
It's a virtual certainty that email to that address goes to an administrative assistant and not directly to the president. Guess why?
589.
▲
"Jobs": That’s the Steve I knew
(salon.com)
2 points
by
pseut
14y ago
|
0 comments
590.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
At least in the US, a bow tie often means, "young republican / political conservative," although I guess the article indirectly makes the case that wearing a bow tie can also mean, "I like to talk about and defend bow ties." So, be aware t
591.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
>One of the virtues of Twitter is that this approach is feasible because of their character limit Photos? Videos?
592.
▲
How to Induce Explosive Debt Dynamics
(econbrowser.com)
1 points
by
pseut
14y ago
|
0 comments
593.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
So, I was about Tito question your news sources when I saw "chip Kelly to the eagles" on the front page. Then I checked and... it's true. Well done.
594.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
So... it's either algorithmic stalking or it's nothing that new, right? I'm going for algorithmic stalking. Now, to really be effective, I guess they're going to have to add "graph alerts" so one can get notified when (totally hypothetica
595.
▲
(photos, artistic nudity) The Computer Thief Who Made an Artist’s Work Better
(slate.com)
3 points
by
pseut
14y ago
|
0 comments
596.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
You may want to check out the RePEc sites for ideas, they're for econ, so you may not have come across them. One main page is: http://ideas.repec.org author listings are: http://ideas.repec.org/i/eall.html Just another possible source
597.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
Who is this aimed for? PhD students? Faculty? Businesses looking for consultants? I'm not that far along in my career (assistant prof in econ) but I know many of the people working in my area personally, so it's not clear how much value
598.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
So, not trying to be a dick, but what does it do? Is it supposed to be a better Google Scholar? The "about" page is pretty terse and all it tells me is that your site is "lovingly crafted" which I'm sure is very wonderful, but uninformati
599.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
R is fine too: it has regular expressions and probably excels if you plan to do statistics using all of that data. Python seems to have reasonable statistics functionality as well (with pandas, etc) but I haven't used it personally.
600.
▲
by
pseut
14y ago
How optimistic of you.
More ›