prymitive

4 ms·

1.
by prymitive 12d ago
27 got the slider so I though: finally I can turn it off even more. Turns out the max value of the slider is what toggling “less Liquid Glass please” was already doing in 26. But at the same time they modified it and now it somehow looks e
2.
by prymitive 12d ago
If it does then do much for focus on quality in this release…
3.
by prymitive 12d ago
Is it just me or is clicking “iOS 27” on iPhone showing upgrade screen for 26.7?
4.
by prymitive 14d ago
Elon also advocated for that when he launched grok. The generous interpretation of this is that Elon cares about humanity, the more likely one is that desperately needed time to catch up with competitors (who were all ahead), so it would be
5.
by prymitive 19d ago
Artificially Generated Invoices? That checks out
6.
by prymitive 19d ago
The story of “great hardware ruined by poor drivers/software” is so old than its truly shocking its still a thing these days
7.
by prymitive 21d ago
The funny thing is that with $40T of public dept US is basically taking money from other countries (in exchange for a pice of paper saying IOU) and then using that money to force these countries to do what’s in US best interests (real or pe
8.
by prymitive 1mo ago
Saying sorry means admitting guilt. If there’s guilt there some level of harm. If there’s harm you can be sued. Avoiding being sued due to causing harm usually means increased costs, because you now need to take care you didn’t take before.
9.
by prymitive 1mo ago
I find it particularly bad at writing test comments, I usually start fixing bugs by adding regression tests and Opus tend to put story into comments for these, including “but it fails because…” followed by bug description including line num
10.
by prymitive 1mo ago
Sounds like engagement KPIs are through the roof since 4.8
11.
by prymitive 1mo ago
For those unfamiliar, “CVE” stands for “CV Enrichment”, common slang in Posture Engineering
12.
by prymitive 2mo ago
+1 it’s a tool It’s not perfect, it has shortcomings, it sometimes produces bogus outputs. All of that is fine for a tool, it’s not fine when it pretends it’s a conscious being, because errors start to feel like lies and it becomes a bit to
13.
Windows 11's Weather app uses ~1GB RAM(omgubuntu.co.uk)
5 points by prymitive 2mo ago|1 comments
14.
by prymitive 2mo ago
I think a lot of that is people who were always very insecure because they’re mediocre engineers. Previously asking questions or not understanding something was a bit painful but now you can hear “you’re absolutely right!” and make progress
15.
by prymitive 2mo ago
To be fair it’s also worth noting that it’s much easier to find a buggy edge case with existing code than it is to write bug free code that doesn’t have any edge cases at all. It’s so much easier to read some concrete logic and find holes i
16.
by prymitive 2mo ago
There’s been infinitely times where I was stuck at some problem and every single solution was complex, messy, over-engineered and somehow wrong, until I went on a walk or moved to a different issue and suddenly it would hit me that I was lo
17.
by prymitive 2mo ago
Anthropic Needs to have the most intelligent and scary agents, so if OpenAI does something bad they need to prove their models can do even worse. Without that the whole valuation collapses. There’ll be more “our model outhacks others” for t
18.
by prymitive 2mo ago
Is it "anti-LLM" or is it anti "here's some code I don't understand that a machine generated for me kthxbye"? Code is not just code, it's also liability and trust.
19.
by prymitive 2mo ago
The invention of modern day CEO will always be celebrated throughout history, such a gift to the world.
20.
by prymitive 2mo ago
A bit of good old “it’s really good idea, I love it, great effort … BUT” Mixed with “if kids can’t get semi dangerous drugs from the back of my van then they will be forced to buy from even shadier, more dangerous dark web van”
21.
by prymitive 2mo ago
I'm sure Anthropic would love for everyone to believe that soon they will be the sole provider of "skills" for the entire planet and every single business transaction is done as a part of the subscription they offer - people
22.
by prymitive 2mo ago
I have never seen a plan written by LLM that wasn’t vague and light on details, every time I need to ask for more details and every time I ask to implement it trips over some dead end in the plan, discards the plan and continues as if there
23.
by prymitive 2mo ago
Every idea taken to extreme becomes unbearable. I ask friends for recommendations on what to read or watch, and I enjoy doing that. But if they would follow me around everywhere and keep suggesting things non stop purely because they make m
24.
by prymitive 2mo ago
Here’s an idea: Musk launches a ton of orbital gpus but in reality it’s just an empty shell and real gpus sit in unused grok data centres. How would we even know?
25.
by prymitive 2mo ago
It used to be that you need a good reason to make huge refactorings, because it’s often so much work. Now agent can rewrite half of your code if your prompt is vague enough and you don’t actual try to review it all. And so the “soul” of a p
26.
by prymitive 2mo ago
How do you manage to make Opus follow any rules? Maybe it’s a windsurf thing but I have a ton of custom rules and Opus just ignores most of them. GPT on the other hand follows them like it’s a cult - if I have a rule I can’t ever force it t
27.
by prymitive 3mo ago
I often find myself annoyed when Opus fixes a typo in a comment and decides to run tests, lints and whenever else it can find to run. Often it will start by stashing current changes just to preemptively check if all tests were passing befor
28.
by prymitive 3mo ago
I need to write code because otherwise LLMs will write too much code, it’s only when you fully understand the problem you can generalise it enough to not end up with 10k lines and 5 abstraction layers for “hello world”. LLMs are token predi
29.
by prymitive 3mo ago
Oh the number of time LLM will, for example, be giving me the list of bugs it found in code, when I ask it for a review, just to decide there’s no big half way through explaining it.
30.
by prymitive 3mo ago
I think the problem here is that LLMs aren’t really “intelligence models” but more like “knowledge models”. LLMs don’t “think”, they just use a clever trick to make it seem like they do. I might not understand a lot about current state of A

More ›