prucomaclu2

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by prucomaclu2 6y ago

   If I'm understanding your position correctly, its basically that the people providing testimony are all liars? I haven't seen evidence of that, and cases being dismissed is likewise not evidence of that. > That claim was pretty
2. 2.▲
   by prucomaclu2 6y ago

   This is indeed a fair point. Several of the lawsuits have been dismissed on the general basis that "election laws being broken is not evidence that fraud occurred". It's logically a true statement, and I think it's a fai
3. 3.▲
   by prucomaclu2 6y ago

   That's a fair point, which is why challenged ballots get marked as "challenged" and not "rejected". It is the duty of the observers to challenge ballots. It is the duty of the election workers to record these challe
4. 4.▲
   by prucomaclu2 6y ago

   Your reply was probably flagged because it had only a link. Generally people expect some content to go with a link. I also doubt most people on HN have the patience to wait for that site to load. It took like a minute. And of course it&#x
5. 5.▲
   by prucomaclu2 6y ago

   This woman's testimony starts at 1:34:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZXkAv7yKgw&list=UU8Ioh4atND... I use this example because I find it particularly blatant, but there are many examples to choose from. Accord