proxynoproxy

6 ms·

31.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
You don’t have to imagine. This is a billion dollar intel industry that pays out millions of dollars for vulns, and charges corrupt governments more for access to hack their citizens most private data. Those unscrupulous enough to sell the
32.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
No!! XRP is ultimately worthless and printed out of nothing. They gave it away in the early days. (Vs mined with real resources in PoW). Convert it into hard Bitcoin and never worry about it again. See ya in 10y!
33.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Nah, that kid of math is illegal in Australia. “The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia”
34.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Grand Censor Fascist Julie Inman Grant, Cyber Karen of Australia, will get her wish - excommunication of the Australian people. Social media will block Australian users of all ages. Australian users were really not that valuable anyway, and
35.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
It really does. Puritanical questers should be far far away from the levers of power. The amount of harm done by ignorant, twisted moralistic campaigns is measured in the decades.
36.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Getting closer!! You are not shocked, and can’t see why anyone would be surprised the knob exists. This is closer to the root issue. I want you to think about people that might be shocked, Not for the shape, but the existence. Or why one mi
37.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Who cares who owns the foot. It’s the action, and the boot, that is the problem. Don’t make this about the owner, make it about the action. And maybe get rid of the boots?
38.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Again, you are missing the point, which may be a product of your environment. It’s not about systemic differences, or who is doing rule of law “properly”. One side is pointing at knobs with the word China crossed out and replaced with USA.
39.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
You are making the same mistake as bytedance. It’s not about applying the law equally, it’s about the abhorrence of such laws. When you have no say in the law, all you can demand is that it is applied equally. When you have a say in the law
40.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
More that the west has a better understanding of exploitation (from experience) and is generally against it now. China still has to learn these lessons, and it will in time. It will need to shake its authoritarian ways first, because lesson
41.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
What TikTok offered was abhorrent to American sensibilities: America: we don’t want ccp censorship of people’s content ByteDance: no problem, here are the knobs for US gov censorship, should be ok! America: you have missed the point entirel
42.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
The dumbest decision that stupid government can make. And it’s not a partisan issue, as when this causes the current party to fail, the “malignant tuber” will ratchet it further. Cooked either way. Australia has always been run by technolog
43.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
The advantage of everyone running the same software and hardware platform is that you can concentrate on hardening that one system. The disadvantage is that vulnerability is universal. The advantage of everyone running a disparate environme
44.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
IMHO their claim is invalidated by appeal to patents. Patents are a sure fire way to ensure that even the most clever of cryptographic constructions is never used in the real world. Open is better than closed. Non-patented encumbered is bet
45.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
“Cyph is the only encryption app that is secure to use in a web browser, thanks to our patented WebSign technology.” Run, don’t walk away from vendors making these claims.
46.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Also it’s super obvious this text is AI “enhanced” (if not entirely synthetic from your notes?). That’s why folks all said the same thing. Real security people don’t talk like this. Be really careful. You are at an age at a point in history
47.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
I did the same thing at your age, re school, so I understand. I also liked coming up with auth schemes. One thing I would suggest is dropping the mail component and not involving it at all - you are using this as a weak second factor, expor
48.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Oh you are 15. I’m glad you are playing in this space! Cybersecurity is a rewarding career. With due respect to the fact you are making an effort to get into the scene, congratulations for making the effort to share! Maybe just hold off on
49.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
Which is why you have no business writing security sensitive software. Maybe come back in a few years after some more study and understanding of this world.
50.
by proxynoproxy 2y ago
First up, you won’t win over security people with big claims of being the future of auth. This ain’t it chief. The future of auth is probably something involving public key cryptography and zero knowledge proofs. This scheme is just complic