proxy9

3 ms·

1.
by proxy9 1y ago
Fun software but the only issue with Instant is their pricing. Once they gain adoption, I expect them to significantly raise their rates, I can seen them charging over $1 per GB easily. And like with any vendor lock-in, you’re stuck paying
2.
by proxy9 3y ago
If we look at the current situation on Twitter, a lot of content that gets pushed by the algo is dumpster fire. Not sure how that benefits society
3.
by proxy9 3y ago
They are already doing it via Meta Verified, which is already a big step us vs Blue since they actually check your id
4.
by proxy9 3y ago
What I dislike about Twitter lately: - overarching political propaganda - crypto bros - AI bros - profit chads - constant fighting over idiotic topics, some driven by Musk itself What I care for when I open Twitter: - news - hearing from
5.
by proxy9 3y ago
It's not just industries, we all do. If we are honest with ourselves, we are just some parasites to this planet
6.
by proxy9 3y ago
Might be interesting for marketing guys but take it from a guy who’s worked with publishers. They hate inline editors.
7.
by proxy9 3y ago
Inline editing is generally a bad idea. I don't see WSJ rocking this anytime soon.
8.
by proxy9 3y ago
I think they care. Vercel is VC money. Not even close to profitability. Anyone building anything but a toy needs to take into consideration that Vercel might not be here in 2 years from now
9.
by proxy9 3y ago
Gimme a effin break. Man people are increasingly lazy. We get excited about a Neondb wrapper now? Really?
10.
by proxy9 4y ago
Paid service on api / llama wrappers. Laaame