prollyignored

8 ms·

31.
by prollyignored 13y ago
> No. I wouldn't. I'm an electrical engineer by training. I agree. Electrical, Electronics, Civil, NASA aka Real Engineering will not have more kludges. Phone Radiation / Drainage Systems have a few "Oh well I'll just leave it here ..."
32.
by prollyignored 13y ago
There you go https://github.com/runekaagaard/snowscript PHP is a kludge. You'd be surprised to know that world is made of kludges with a few elegant hacks thrown in and not the other way round. Performance hacks are always kludges. Can yo
33.
by prollyignored 13y ago
For all the hate given to PHP, I still can't understand why the cool-elite-rockstar-ninja-sexy-hot-hackers of python/ruby/java/go/haskell/clojure/S *t can't come up with half-as-dumb replacement for mod_php and compete with it on its own t
34.
by prollyignored 13y ago
> ... market that will be easily plundered due to weak political systems and fragmentation. Profit from weapons. Profit from (medical) patents. Will never sell industrial patents, whilst exploiting African Earth. You know the story of h
35.
by prollyignored 13y ago
You'd be surprised to know that surgical instruments make good murder weapons.
36.
by prollyignored 13y ago
> (8 nation alliance, Opium Wars, World War II, etc). It's irrational and this is no excuse or justification of their disgusting behaviour, but I think this is what's happening in many cases. Even today, "Caucasians" don't visit countri
37.
by prollyignored 13y ago
> Most of the work is spent on figuring out the right question to ask, and only the little part is needed to actually answer it. These arguments are always a form of "Whole > Sum of Parts". There is no such thing as private ideas. I
38.
by prollyignored 13y ago
sigh closes Sublime Text ...
39.
by prollyignored 13y ago
Honestly, AFAIK only PHP comes with a bigger laundry list. The only python wart I know is no block scope for i in [1,2,3]: print i print i # still visible Only functions introduce lexical scope in Python/JS. JS has th
40.
by prollyignored 13y ago
> This decreases the syntactic pain use 5.018; no warnings "experimental::lexical_subs"; use feature "lexical_subs"; Don't use perl experimental features. Not portable. Not well thought. May break horribly. "state sub c
41.
by prollyignored 13y ago
I use points as I am a bad writer. * Don't use $a, $b for variable names, affecting sort * Don't use each for iterating over hashes * Global effects of .. * next operator is dynamic sub foo() { next; #breaks while loop }
42.
by prollyignored 13y ago
I was a Perl lover once. And now it seems I understand the haters. Just don't use Perl . The language seems fine, productive, even sublime at first but you will encounter some horrible design features. Just read the following, http://mark