3 ms·
Honestly, AFAIK only PHP comes with a bigger laundry list. The only python wart I know is no block scope for i in [1,2,3]: print i print i # s
by prollyignored 13y ago
Honestly, AFAIK only PHP comes with a bigger laundry list.
The only python wart I know is no block scope
for i in [1,2,3]:
print i
print i # still visible
Only functions introduce lexical scope in Python/JS. JS has the ===, this, undefined
The only ruby wart for me is the difference between block/lambda/Proc and perly features.
Java/Go/Lua don't turn you into a omlette, with their language features. Nor do they leak memory in XS like perl.
C++ is a differnt story.
EDIT: Added JS
- sigzero 13y agoThen you don't know anything about Ruby and Python warts. Take yourself out of the conversation please or at Google before you blather.
- hello3 13y agoWhy doesn't he know anything about Python or Ruby warts? I think his complaint about Python is valid. The other wart I would add is Python having a default empty list in a method signature. In successive calls to the function if you modify the list it retains it's value. (The solution is to have it set to None in the method signature). Read http://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/controlflow.html#function-annotations http://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/controlflow.html#function-... section 4.7.1 if you're curious Generally though I'd say Perl has hundreds (or maybe thousands) of warts for every one Python or Ruby has.
- rimantas 13y agoEnlighten us.
- sigzero 13y agoPython has its own wiki about them for one (first Google hit): http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWarts http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWarts Here is one of the first Google hits for Ruby: http://jgaskins.org/blog/2012/05/16/ruby-warts/ http://jgaskins.org/blog/2012/05/16/ruby-warts/ Every languages has warts. Lots of them.