proksoup

11 ms·

91.
by proksoup 11y ago
It indicates your attitude towards how one should act. Obviously, one should act in their own self interest and use the law to it's fullest extent, not consider the social consequences of being a dick. Good luck sir.
92.
by proksoup 11y ago
They did fail to identify the problem .... But if there's any anger from screwed employees, it should be directed at the criminals who did the bullshit crime instead of the detectives who failed to identify the crime sooner, no?
93.
by proksoup 11y ago
> The details of moderation practices are routinely hidden from public view, siloed within companies and treated as trade secrets when it comes to users and the public. Despite persistent calls from civil society advocates for transparen
94.
by proksoup 11y ago
I've experienced it myself, felt identical to the author's experience, becoming aware. There's plenty of other untrustworthy anecdotal evidence[1] on the internet, but I'm not aware of any published research on the matte
95.
by proksoup 11y ago
It most certainly is, and the disarray caused by finding people to contain motivations that were hidden can radically alter relationships. Stay in the dark maybe I don't know I wish the light bulbs we already found were legal, but me m
96.
by proksoup 11y ago
I had a (medication induced) experience similar to the author's, with similar perception of radical changes in the motivations/intentions of my coworkers and friends, but mostly I remember it being like bright light was turned on
97.
by proksoup 11y ago
Try serving them a pig with the head still attached, similar reaction, next day bacon for breakfast. Don't want to think about that real animal stuff, I doubt the line has much to do with the intelligence of the species.
98.
by proksoup 11y ago
He said most people, just looking at McDonald's popularity alone, maybe an indication of how interested most people are in understanding the sources of their food.
99.
by proksoup 11y ago
Yup, just need to "synthesize" words and melodies as the gp said and you're set. "To create a song, the user must input the melody and lyrics".
100.
by proksoup 11y ago
That's really interesting. They talk[1] about being able to automate it in the future but it seems like there may be a lot of human involvement still. That article goes further, that their goal is to be Instagram like, helping the unle
101.
by proksoup 11y ago
Music has meaning, it's a tool for communicating very complex ideas. I don't think anthropomorphising something that generates pleasant sounds is going to get you anywhere, by the time you get anywhere interesting, you've bec
102.
by proksoup 11y ago
Hm, there are statements where it's not required, like function definitions[1], so it's more confusing than just "after each statement", no? [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1834642/why-sh
103.
by proksoup 11y ago
Ha, you had me til the AI part. Personally I figure the musicians will have the last jobs, along with designers. Really artists generally speaking will be the most difficult AI, no?
104.
by proksoup 11y ago
I like working on code bases without semi colons better than those with, because the choice to drop is indicative of the team's attitudes, and I often find many other things I like about those softwares. The rules to drop them are simp
105.
by proksoup 11y ago
> Laughter? Now wait a minute! A real scientist should avoid any and all anthropomorphism, which is why hard-nosed colleagues often ask us to change our terminology. Why not call the ape’s reaction something neutral, like, say, vocaliz
106.
by proksoup 11y ago
100% agreed. I work for a slack competitor that has away messages, and I'm jealous of Slack's willingness to ignore the old interface patterns and implement the simplest solution possible that makes the most sense for larger group
107.
by proksoup 11y ago
Perhaps in response google could identify their own image they just served from recaptcha being google searched and throw the google image search into a captcha jail? .... if they have a large enough pool of images they are using, to be abl
108.
by proksoup 11y ago
Ha, misread your first sentence and thought you were talking about US terrorizing the world, but thinking now you don't view the us war on terror as terrorism itself eh?
109.
by proksoup 11y ago
Could you say more about those things they should be doing? I'm naive but it doesn't seem trivial to me.
110.
Gumbo – A pure-C HTML5 parser(github.com)
12 points by proksoup 11y ago|0 comments
111.
by proksoup 11y ago
I would be interested in learning more about this, or their agenda, what school or article is being referred to here?
112.
by proksoup 11y ago
I found some comments on Reddit that proposed: > It's probably a channel dedicated to a paint-2-sound generator. Example (that's very old software: Coagula). Pixels actually represent the spectrum over time (X), and the color i
113.
by proksoup 11y ago
It would make more sense to me to say: "The purpose of the economy is to grow food sustainably." Then it would it say: "The purpose of sustainable agriculture is to support the economy" The economy is a tool we use to ma
114.
by proksoup 11y ago
> Agriculture's purpose is economic. Eating (and eating tasty food) does have a large demand though. I'm maybe just repeating what the parent comment said, but that seems backwards to me. If we treat agriculture's purpose
115.
by proksoup 11y ago
Rich kids cheating in college is maybe old news, is maybe why the downvotes for saying "it's these rich kids over here that created this problem".
116.
by proksoup 11y ago
> results showing the number of dementia diagnoses in Europe has stabilized during the last 20 years Diagnosis changes seem a possible contributing factor to me. We pick new names for things and recategorize them.
117.
by proksoup 11y ago
Over what time period? Like the last 2 years or longer or shorter? What specifically is the poor being asked about?
118.
by proksoup 11y ago
> It's basic reality that there are people we are told we need to have compassion and empathy for, yet they have none for us Even if you succeed, and you provide enough for an abundant lifestyle ... perhaps they then have many child
119.
by proksoup 11y ago
Why? Our resources aren't infinite. Why is there any should about who gets to live and who gets to die? We can't help everyone live without eventually hitting resource constraints, can we?
120.
by proksoup 11y ago
"Just trying things in production" is a serious problem. "Trying things in development" is I think a necessary step in learning ... you have to get to that point eventually, and that comes I think before the "change

More ›