Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
prng2021
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
prng2021
5d ago
Can someone clarify the use case for this? What's the benefit over this: https://openai.com/index/introducing-the-agents-api/
2.
▲
by
prng2021
10d ago
You’re taking their shoe example way too literally. It’s just showing they’re catering to the average user, not an engineer. And tons of average Joe users now have very high expectations of how intelligent a LLM is because they’ve interacte
3.
▲
by
prng2021
10d ago
The inference time results are quite different. These models haven’t just been trained with tons of docs, blog entries and videos about Java 8. They’ve also been trained on tons of code examples from simple to complex real world ones. You’r
4.
▲
by
prng2021
19d ago
In your opinion, what are the top 2 positives and top 2 negatives of humanity inventing AGI?
5.
▲
by
prng2021
20d ago
Although many share your mindset, I’m glad there are also many that don’t. Otherwise we’d still have countries in a race to keep building up their nuclear weapons for the same exact reasons you just described.
6.
▲
Anthropic's distillation battle turns to the dark web as China concerns swell
(cnbc.com)
3 points
by
prng2021
23d ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
OpenAI's ring-shaped smart speaker will reportedly cost between $300 and $400
(engadget.com)
7 points
by
prng2021
2mo ago
|
5 comments
8.
▲
by
prng2021
2mo ago
What is this conversation even about? I can’t understand any of it.
9.
▲
by
prng2021
3mo ago
xAI had $2.5B in operating losses in the past quarter. What savings are being passed on?
10.
▲
by
prng2021
3mo ago
Thanks for the irrelevant comment. I’m criticizing these Chinese companies because these aren’t accomplishments. Where did I praise Anthropic?
11.
▲
by
prng2021
3mo ago
[flagged]
12.
▲
by
prng2021
3mo ago
“That unlocks something beyond energy savings: the possibility of eliminating water consumption entirely.” They’ve made this claim numerous times in the article and I really don’t understand it. The building has tons of water being recircul
13.
▲
by
prng2021
4mo ago
We’ve got a company of several thousand employees serving hundreds of millions of people arguably the best AI model in the market. Meanwhile you’re asking for a handkerchief for your pool of tears because their product is struggling to do
14.
▲
by
prng2021
5mo ago
Yes but my original reply was to someone that seemed to imply that this founder was dumb not to verify that Railway’s API key that should have been limited to managing custom domains, truly was limited to managing custom domains. I’ve nev
15.
▲
by
prng2021
5mo ago
“why would you not do the same for APIs you integrate with?” Who does that? Jira and Salesforce have hundreds of endpoints each. AWS has hundreds of services, and each may have hundreds of endpoints. Who on your team is testing key scopes o
16.
▲
by
prng2021
5mo ago
Sorry but are you implying that for every system you integrate with, you verify the scope of an API key by checking each CRUD operation on every API endpoint they provide?
17.
▲
OpenAI reportedly plans to double its workforce to 8k employees
(engadget.com)
9 points
by
prng2021
6mo ago
|
1 comments
18.
▲
OpenAI to create desktop super app, combining ChatGPT app, browser and Codex app
(cnbc.com)
4 points
by
prng2021
6mo ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
by
prng2021
7mo ago
How is anyone predicting timelines for AGI when these systems can’t do basic addition of 2 arbitrary numbers with 100% accuracy?
20.
▲
by
prng2021
7mo ago
“I think the decision was made because the people making this decision at Anthropic are well-intentioned, driven by values, and motivated by trying to make the transition to powerful AI to go well.” Every single one of these CEOs happily pi
21.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
“You never needed 1000s of engineers to build software anyway” What is the point of even mentioning this? We live in reality. In reality, there are countless companies with thousands of engineers making each piece of software. Outside of
22.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
This was a great article. The section “Training for the next state prediction” explains a solution using subagents. If I’m understanding it correctly, we could test if that solution is directionally correct today, right? I ask a LLM a ques
23.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
Hard to tell how widespread it is but it’s not just 1 company. https://www.webpronews.com/silicon-valleys-2025-ai-boom-revi...
24.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
Thanks for repeating what the author explained.
25.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
Where did they say that?
26.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
Did they post the knowledge cutoff date somewhere
27.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
Yea I guess that's accurate but they also explained that AI capabilities advance every 6-12 months and managing a team of agents buys you a few years. So their proposed solution and conclusion that it keeps you safe for years makes no
28.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
The author gives this example of the problem and incorrect way to leverage AI: "Sarah was relieved. She thought she could focus on high-value synthesis work. She’d take the agent’s output and refine it, add strategic insights, make it
29.
▲
MIT's new 'recursive' framework lets LLMs process 10M tokens
(venturebeat.com)
2 points
by
prng2021
8mo ago
|
0 comments
30.
▲
by
prng2021
8mo ago
“existence is a requirement to have morality. That implies that the highest good are those decisions that improve the long-term survival odds of a) humanity, and b) the biosphere.” Those are too pie in the sky statements to be of any use in
More ›