printf_kek0

4 ms·

1.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
Thank you. Please indulge me if you have time with two more questions: 1. In some libraries (SQLLite for instance, and libev too I think) the authors have a script that "amalgamates" all sources into a single translation unit.Thei
2.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
I agree with the last part; should ask the Musl author(s) to substantiate this assertion. > [...] the standard should have included a keyword -- or the compiler authors a flag -- to allow people to opt in to these sorts of optimizations
3.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
I would also like an explanation. The author(s) of Musl (libc alternative) mention on this page that it can potentially invoke undefined behavior: https://wiki.musl-libc.org/alternatives.html However, having used a few of t
4.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
> deterministic source of randomness There is a manifest contradiction here created by this choice of words.
5.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
> Are you saying, for example, that it shouldn't be illegal for someone to put posters up on every street corner in their town saying that Mexicans are all child molestors and should be shot? Where should the line be drawn? It would
6.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
I am probably among the tiny minority of users who strongly objects to any form of Content Moderation whatsoever. Regulatory requirements notwithstanding, a policy that dictates what content gets filtered to users is analogous to a parent
7.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
The only cure for ignorance is knowledge. Stop doubting and being afraid and go learn...
8.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
Weak argument from analogy given the (lacking) degree of relevant similarity. See: On Analogy, A System of Logic by John Stuart Mill for a thorough analysis of analogical reasoning: https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/m/mi
9.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
> Hate speech is not an opinion in this sense: it is not something presented as an argument or topic for discussion. According to J.S. Mill, free speech should only be constrained to the extent that it violates what he calls the harm pr
10.
by printf_kek0 9y ago
He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side; if he does not so mu