princess-aslaug

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   Maybe women that are free to choose more often don't want to graduate in STEM.
2. 2.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   Not sure how this is news worthy. This is a minor feature of one of the many Android devices out there.
3. 3.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   Thanks. The question will be if owning the best or first autonomous driving logic, good enough that can be mass deployed, will be such a big advantage to make the fact you can make a good car almost irrelevant compared to that.
4. 4.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   I don't have numbers but I was thinking to spectacular failures like Google Wave or similar software projects. For sure they were also built by large teams and costed a non trivial amount of money, but this kind of research on autonomo
5. 5.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   Good point but it rarely failed at something that was requiring such financial investment.
6. 6.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   Ehm, pick a niche programming language, build your client for a complex system. All cool, but it's not the straight line to solve problems in a company in the simplest and most effective way. Good thing if you have some spare R&D t
7. 7.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   Hard to tell why initially you were downvoted so much. It's actually a very interesting comment for me, and a very clever strategy because if Waymo fails, while the press will say it's Google owned, it will still be felt as a sepa
8. 8.▲
   by princess-aslaug 9y ago

   I wonder if the FCA plan to be the platform for Google's self driving AI, instead of trying to develop their own AI like other car vendors are doing, make sense. In some way it seems very hard and costly to build your own AI, even Tesl