Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
president
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
president
4y ago
What's the fallacy about pitting your own citizens against foreign workers who must work for low wages and crap wages or face deportation? Jobs are a zero sum game. Don't forget - once you bring in a firehose of foreign workers, t
62.
▲
by
president
4y ago
Any system with weighting/voting will inevitably become biased in some way or another. I would like to see a social network with only individual entities allowed (no companies, or organizations), verified accounts (but people can still
63.
▲
by
president
4y ago
Noble move but I hope this doesn't cause unintended consequences. If costs go up because alternative methods are more expensive, people will end up importing from countries that don't have these bans. Are these economic side-effec
64.
▲
by
president
4y ago
Shadowbanning is a symptom, not the disease. The scale at which these large social networks run have so much power to influence our perception of the world. If any bias, let alone major lopsided political bias, is involved in judging who do
65.
▲
by
president
4y ago
Agreed. At the very least, fully verified identities on the backend and anonymity on the frontend.
66.
▲
by
president
4y ago
What happened to just letting things play out? You don't know what's going to happen.
67.
▲
by
president
5y ago
I'm betting on fake story for karma. Makes you think how many stories we hear on the internet are fake yet shape our perception of the world for many people who take things at face value.
68.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Why buy when their bots and shills sway public opinion on Twitter organically?
69.
▲
by
president
5y ago
To attract youth to a lowly paying government job, they need to appeal to emotion. Same way tech companies attracted college kids by telling them they were helping to "save the world".
70.
▲
by
president
5y ago
He's trolling and lampooning people that are obsessed with blindly agreeing with the mainstream-sanctioned narratives (Covid, Ukraine). The book thing is probably a comment on censorship and historical revisionism that is occurring as
71.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Would you apologize if you were proven wrong?
72.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Has anyone seriously and honestly asked themselves why the US is so keen on pushing the LQBTQ agenda? Even if sincere, LGBTQ people are a very tiny percentage of the population so why go through such lengths to make large and sweeping syste
73.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Well there is a geopolitical perspective to this as well right? Wouldn't want our biggest adversary to have strategic influence over these nations. Not to mention the potential intelligence capabilities from installing our equipment ra
74.
▲
by
president
5y ago
How many people are needed to staff a modern data center?
75.
▲
by
president
5y ago
IMO cancel culture wasn't as large as a problem until it was sanctioned by very large and influential people and institutions like the NYT.
76.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Most are willing to live life to the fullest with negligible risks. Others who want to live life locked down and living in a plastic bubble, feel free to do so. If you think Covid can be eradicated with zero-covid policies, look at how Chin
77.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Optimizing things makes people feel good because we enjoy progress as it gives us a sense of productivity and accomplishment.
78.
▲
by
president
5y ago
This is how it should have been. I continue to say to this day, if things were really that bad, people would have tested/vaccinated/masked/locked down on their own volition. They would not have to have been mandated or compel
79.
▲
by
president
5y ago
I think a lot of people just find the topic of conspiracy theories interesting and entertaining. You don't need to hate on them for what is essentially a hobby.
80.
▲
by
president
5y ago
And yet the US seemingly does nothing about it. Makes you think whether the US government is turning a blind eye or they believe there the benefits outweigh the costs.
81.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Eat clean (cut out sugars and starches), eat less, expend calories (through exercise). There are no shortcuts besides getting surgery. The more you embrace the pain of doing the above, the more successful you will become. That applies to al
82.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Because social media gave literal juveniles power in numbers whereas in real life their opinions would have been largely ignored. On social media, you don't know if you're talking to a high-schooler, a bot, or a state sponsored tr
83.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Would you be okay with media censoring content that opposed the Japanese internment because it was wartime during WW2?
84.
▲
by
president
5y ago
If anyone is to blame for our troubles, it's you for trying to make this an us vs them issue. There are valid reasons for and against domestic oil production.
85.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Your rationale makes sense in a paradise world where there are no wars and no countries vying for hegemony. There is an immense national security aspect and domestic economic situation you are ignoring which could not be anymore relevant to
86.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Agreed. If there's anything I've learned over the years, it's that Democrats and Republicans are equally nasty. The only difference is one side is much more powerful because they are supported by virtually every cultural inst
87.
▲
by
president
5y ago
> HN has long been infiltrated by CCP-backed commenters I suspect this is true to some degree but I also think there is no shortage of Chinese nationalists and anti-Americans (including Americans) who by default, upvote anything that ha
88.
▲
by
president
5y ago
I disagree with you but I don't think the downvotes you're getting are justified. If you really do prefer Chinese spying, why so?
89.
▲
by
president
5y ago
Isn't this just going to end up causing companies to post large salary ranges with no intention of paying the higher part of the range?
90.
▲
by
president
5y ago
You seem to treat scientists as an infallible group of people unable to be corrupted by biases (corporate funding, personal idealogy, etc).
More ›