Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
power78
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
power78
7y ago
Why not go to the local pound and taking the dogs on a walk? That way you can feel the satisfaction of providing happiness to less-fortunate animals and not have to worry about owning one.
32.
▲
by
power78
7y ago
You are overthinking a lot of this, in my opinion. Sure, people will find ways to stay connected regardless, but you can't deny the ease these services offer in staying connected, making it easier to be more social.
33.
▲
by
power78
7y ago
I think you're not realizing the biological foundation of social interaction; it's not merely a product of society.
34.
▲
by
power78
7y ago
I thought the federal government was able to from the whole San Bernardino shooting suspect's phone?
35.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
I love my Bose ones, they seem to be as good as my wired Senneheiser ones. That's just my opinion though.
36.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
You make valid points, I was merely posting that question/pov since I've had Bluetooth headphones for a few years so it hasn't really affected me, and I agree that the industry unfortunately looks like it isn't going bac
37.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
Can USB-C splitters charge and output at the same time like the MacBook ones do?
38.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
That's a valid point. Out of curiosity, do phones have good enough audio hardware that makes wired sound better than Bluetooth? IMO (I'm no audio engineer) the new Bluetooth standards have pretty good bandwidth that I'd imagi
39.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
Being honestly curious, do android or iOS phones offer audio quality/signal comparable to standalone headphone amps expensive Senneheiser headphones are designed to perform best with? Disclosure: I also own $500 Senneheiser headphones,
40.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
I'd say it's a very fair comparison. Google controls the Pixel ecosystem and Apple controls the iPhone.
41.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
Seriously. This argument is getting old. Bluetooth headphones aren't that difficult to find cheap now anyways. Are people really that attached to their old wired headphones?
42.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
That would be a lot of extra launch weight just to return the first stage, not to mention the danger of having filled boosters on the rocket the whole launch.
43.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
Great video, thanks! Interesting how people are ok with copying others but hate to be copied (in part 4 of the video series). I never really thought about this issue the way that author presented it.
44.
▲
by
power78
8y ago
I found a lot, here's one: https://9to5mac.com/2015/01/26/nexus-6/
45.
▲
by
power78
9y ago
These guys must have sold investors hard for Google to put 120 million into this. Maybe there is an angle here I'm not seeing.
46.
▲
by
power78
10y ago
How is that possible?
47.
▲
by
power78
10y ago
It is strange. They were trying to decrease update sizes by using File-by-File patching, for example, but never decided to use the best applicable compression library until an intern came along?
48.
▲
by
power78
10y ago
Ism not the original person, but I live in Santa Barbara (about 60 miles away). You can definitely hear the rumble, delayed by several minutes. The launches at the middle of the night are the best since it's so quiet.
49.
▲
by
power78
10y ago
This article just displays the author's lack of knowledge of the subject matter he is developing with. Something tells me it was written just to get the company's name out there.
50.
▲
by
power78
10y ago
It was a software, not a hardware, update that enabled this feature
51.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
I hope you don't mean the "grab a snickers" wording. That is not an Easter egg.
52.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
Edit: I'm sorry guys, I guess the file that the install button links to is not the addon itself like the Firefox addon site does, so saving it does not give you the addon. I'm retarded. He does not have tracking cookies, I apologize.
53.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
I'm sorry I was wrong. The file that the install button does not link to the addon like the Firefox addon site does, so saving the link is not the addon. I apologize.
54.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
Edit: I'm sorry guys, I guess the file that the install button links to is not the addon itself like the Firefox addon site does, so saving it does not give you the addon. I'm retarded. He does not have tracking cookies, I apologize.
55.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
He actually is doing this. Take a look at the source code. He has tracking javascript right at the bottom. Its sort of ironic...
56.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
I don't really like that he puts tracking javascript in his addons. Take a look at the source of this Facebook Disconnect addon, its at the bottom. Why don't people just write a simple bash script that toggles blocks for the facebook domain
57.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
Not really. Do you even know the mission of the Flock browser?
58.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
Sorry if I came off as being rude, it was not my intention. I was merely asking questions, but I guess it seemed harsh.
59.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
You can always go to Reddit to discuss something like this. HN is not the place.
60.
▲
by
power78
15y ago
That doesn't mean its the place for it.
More ›