pouetpouet

15 ms·

121.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
As an emergency measure it's not a bad idea. But it just shows the shortcomings of the transport policies. They have to think of smarter ways in the future. Outright ban old gasoil cars without particulate filters, congestion charge, s
122.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
I just ditched my account. It's overrated. It doesn't provide much value to me whilst bringing the same problems as Facebook.
123.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
Tokyo has lots of high rise. But that's not the point. Lots of medium to big cities do it without high rise buildings. I have lived in a 7-8 thousand poeple/sq mi neighborhood. It's not NYC. It was only 5 levels/4stories
124.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
I, too, like to go wherever I want. But it doesn't mean that every active member of the society HAS TO own one. I adore the freedom it gives me on nights/week-ends. But we don't need 2/3 cars per family. Carshare has som
125.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
If you live there, it's not unspoilt. If you love nature, stay away from it, you have a bigger footprint in the country than in an urban core. If you have a partner, it's not about the freedom of owning a car. Many couples/fa
126.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
This really is a bad idea. This subsidies sprawl and fuel consuming lifestyles. Gas taxes pay for a part of the externalities of fuel burning which rural folks do a lot more than urban dwellers.
127.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
Languages shape the mind. A language gives a special outlook on life and has its own reality. There are also specific linguistic features that are interesting to linguists and help to comprehend how languages work. One could also draw a pa
128.
by pouetpouet 13y ago
Fuck you quora.