posix86

12 ms·

121.
by posix86 4y ago
Tbh, I'm often mindlessly watching stuff on youtube, it's mostly time I consider wasted anyway, there's rarely something really productive to do there. And, in that mode, I've watched many videos many times over. Comedia
122.
by posix86 4y ago
Very very unlikely that youtube isn't perfectly clean on which videos are purely music.
123.
by posix86 4y ago
Why should the will to be free and have your own goals be a necessary part of sentience? It's a feature, nothing else. You can make humans that don't want to go outside; you can make humans who do exactly as they're told all
124.
by posix86 4y ago
Researchers at universities only have to justify their work in very broad strokes when it comes to mathematics, if at all. It's true that most researchers are motivated like you say, because they like it, because if you do it due to ut
125.
by posix86 4y ago
Duh, that's my point. The previous comment seems to suggest that a sign of intellice is taking time to think, in general. I'm saying a sign of intelligence is knowing when thinking longer is worth it. Some people take their time e
126.
by posix86 4y ago
I never click on ads even if I know it's what I'm looking for, often it's the wrong page on the right website. Looks like I'm alone in this though.
127.
by posix86 4y ago
I don't think you can generalize like that, at all. A better sign of intelligence is knowing when thinking deeply is in place. And most often it's not. Most often it's more cumbersome to think for a long time than making the
128.
by posix86 4y ago
Hm but isn't that how all static analysis tools, including Rust'a compiler itself, work? I.e.: You know the function body is, according to some definition, let's say aliasing, consistent. You annotate the function signature,
129.
by posix86 4y ago
I think there's utility in differentiating between "long term" and "short term" motivation. You should follow your long term motivation, and completely unlink from short term motivation. Say you have to study for an
130.
by posix86 4y ago
Yeah thought so too... in particular the example where you pass a a generator to a db, the generator isn't actually executed, and instead the expression is parsed & transformed to SQL. This is cool if it works. Good luck when it do
131.
by posix86 4y ago
You're still on the text streams!!
132.
by posix86 4y ago
Ooh i was wondering why i only got google... am on Chrome on Android
133.
by posix86 4y ago
Rust's type checker is very clever tough. You can omit types almost anywhere, and rust will infer it. Say you net a vector containing Foo object. You can just do let mut v = Vec::new(); v.push(m_foo); In fact it's so
134.
by posix86 4y ago
This might be a factor but it must be stated that the primary reason why international players had trouble penetrating Swiss markets was due to trade regulations which prevent retailers to sell anything duty-free or at a reasonable duty in
135.
by posix86 4y ago
Agreed until the very last sentence. Refactoring should never happen for its own sake. You should never make code beautiful because it's beautiful. It should be nice to the extent, as you correctly said, that it facilitates creating va
136.
by posix86 4y ago
No the problem here are Bing & co., their algorithm is clearly not good enough.
137.
by posix86 4y ago
This is 100% how I feel too haha. And everytime I loose the feeling of understanding them, I question if I understood them before.
138.
by posix86 4y ago
Disagree. If you truly understand something, you must have prooven it to yourself, everything is just a mental help ("donkey bridge" in german) that allows you to remember the statement better - weather it's right or not, you
139.
by posix86 4y ago
You're putting up a scarecrow... you're saying people said that linux was perfect for gaming, except for the fact that it doesn't have anti cheat? No way. If anything, people said: If Linux wants to take off, it needs to have
140.
by posix86 4y ago
I mean if you can negotiate well (& are absolutely amazing at your job), you might be able to convince them that they either pay you full time even though you only work part time, or they pay you more than full time (i.e. give you a big
141.
by posix86 4y ago
You might be right, but in general, most famous channels on youtube are famous bcs of youtube.
142.
by posix86 4y ago
I think that's his point. The point in life isn't to have money, it's to spend time on things you liked. Thus, trading time to save money is a bad trade, but trading money for time that you enjoy is what you should do. Which
143.
by posix86 4y ago
> How do you manage? You're asking bcs you think the way it is is bad, no? You've spent 3 years trying to find out what the best thing to do could be. If you had found it & done it, that would've been the best outcome.
144.
by posix86 4y ago
That's one of their best features!! I'm using discovery bcs I want to listen to tracks similar to the one i use as a basis. If they mix some of my liked tracks in there that are similar too (which they usually are), that makes it
145.
by posix86 4y ago
What's wrong with a playlist: Saved for later?
146.
by posix86 4y ago
I asked Notion to implement inline LaTex, bcs it's the last thing missing for me to use Notion during math lectures. They did so a couple weeks later, even told my I was part of the reason they did!
147.
by posix86 4y ago
you can? click on the quote author
148.
by posix86 4y ago
I'm 100% certain they did put in actual effort. If you're so keen on knowing, there's a form at the bottom you can use to ask them.
149.
by posix86 4y ago
Agreed. It seems to me e.g. Germany is very open to immigration in all forms, IF, immigrants are willing integrate sufficiently into the EU value system concerning equality of sexes, blindess towards ethnicity, freedom of religion etc. They
150.
by posix86 4y ago
I'm open for different opinions, but in my view, being more productive for its own sake is fundamentally misinformed. Being productive means being more efficient at producing output. To get there, you need to put effort into optimizing

More ›