Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
porkpieshoe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
Interesting theory and I can see how you get there. But if drainage changes were the primary cause, we would've seen drought severity increasing across the time period where straightening/etc were happening... instead the drought
2.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
DOGE carefully cut: - NLRB which was investigating employees fired as retaliation for criticizing Musk's actions - OFCCP which was auditing Tesla for workplace discrimination - EEOC which had sued Tesla for racial harassment and discri
3.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
Since I got downvoted for posting that, I'll also add that Pantex doesn't cause a sudden and massive spike in electricity usage, with the potential for related costs to be socialized into my bill.
4.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
If it was this simple, then high costs would be limited to the labor-driven portion of the bills. This is not the case.
5.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
I default to credit/charge cards over debit cards because, in my country, debit cards offer far less consumer protection than credit cards.
6.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
Pantex doesn't power a panopticon, nor does it threaten my livelihood.
7.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
So to be clear, the prediction is that every single location on earth will be economically infeasible due to politics, and that these same politics will have no impact on the launch or satellite businesses? GMAFB. It's stock pump bulls
8.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
How many times have you been banned, that this was repeatedly explained to you?
9.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
Why would I care about any of that? I was just trying to provide a helpful demo for the OP.
10.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
Even weirder that you decided to snipe then.
11.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
Yes. I was surprised when you didn't understand my post and answered literally. I am less surprised that you're being kind of an asshole in exactly the HN way. You've nailed the shitty, condescending attitude. You've go
12.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
It's been a long, long time since there was value in having identity here. In 2010, sure, it was possible to make an actual, valuable professional connection on this site... but today? Nah. This is just a time-waste/wank site, a
13.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
What's a main? I am a little upset that my over the top demonstration failed.
14.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
I think your objection may be to a narrower definition of happiness than what was used in the article. The article's measure is a global life evaluation that would be the product of the activities that you "DO strive towards"
15.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
What (if any) data are you using? Because at a glance, both halves of your initial claim appear to be false. Roughly 14% of Americans are black, and the measures I've found put black representation between 8-16% depending on which mea
16.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
1mo ago
You're absolutely right, it would be a load-bearing mistake to adopt LLM jargon as a human speaker.
17.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
2mo ago
It's helpful to avoid "both sides"-ing, or abandoning all hope. Clinton through 2001 - ended with a 1.2% GDP surplus Bush through 2009 - ended with a 9.8% GDP deficit Obama through 2017 - ended with a 3.4% GDP deficit Trump t
18.
▲
by
porkpieshoe
2mo ago
Counterpoint: I drove past TSMC in Surprise AZ and I counted at least 18 large construction cranes on that single site.