ponyous

3 ms·

1.
by ponyous 11d ago
It really depends on the complexity of the model you are trying to generate and the budget you have.
2.
by ponyous 11d ago
You mean people blind in one eye? I think it still works, but obviously depth perception will not be there
3.
by ponyous 12d ago
Surprisingly Gemini models. Spatial understanding seems to be the best for the price and speed.
4.
by ponyous 13d ago
https://grandpacad.com - AI modeling for 3D printing Been at it for about year and a half. Really exciting stuff is happening literally every month, because underlying models are getting better and better. When I started it was
5.
by ponyous 16d ago
> I have a feeling that the price of 1 million tokens transmitted over the internet is more expensive than cache hit. And this kinda makes sense. What is cheaper few KB of disk space or internet bandwidth?
6.
by ponyous 24d ago
We went for 16% intelligence bump according to artificial analysis for +82% of the cost. Interesting. Comparing 4.8 Opus with Fable 5.1
7.
by ponyous 1mo ago
On my benchmark where AIs generate ~20 different 3D models about 1/2 the time of Opus and 1/3 of the time of Kimi K3 and 2/3 of time of sonnet.
8.
by ponyous 2mo ago
Yeah you can absolutely do multiple parts, although the mating features are still a bit rough you can do a lot already.
9.
by ponyous 2mo ago
GrandpaCAD - AI 3D modeling software focused on simplicity. Made it so even my grandpa could model. He’s been asking me for years when will I teach him how to 3D model. I tried, we failed and then I seen him use ChatGPT so I knew there was
10.
by ponyous 2mo ago
You are right, relatively to other llm providers this is not slow. But if you think what is possible when you have 1000t/s a sec you might find it slow.
11.
by ponyous 2mo ago
Spark email client supports this. It’s great
12.
by ponyous 2mo ago
I agree with the conclusion and am happy to see this blog post, but this killed a bit of credibility for me: > Using a single LLM judge for scoring. Every score here comes from one model, GPT-5.6 Luna, looking at one image at a time. I d
13.
by ponyous 3mo ago
Interesting way to show off a model last on every benchmark. Not sure any other lab is doing this
14.
by ponyous 3mo ago
As someone who just had success with equivalent system in EU my recommendation is to get someone who's done it before to do it for you. I hired an agency. They took 8% fee, which is pretty low, usually it's between 10% and 15%.
15.
by ponyous 3mo ago
Absolutely. Running it now, will update this comment in about 30 mins. Edit: Surprisingly very good results with 3.0 flash with high thinking. Cost: $0.06 Duration: 3.22 min Code Errors: 1.3 per attempts (meaning on average it had to retry
16.
by ponyous 3mo ago
I don't have the eval results live yet, so I cannot share them yet. I was benchmarking using a soon to be released new version of my AI CAD modeling software[0]. It's basically an agent that has access to tools that can execute bu
17.
by ponyous 3mo ago
Just ran and scored 63 3d model generations (via code) across high and no reasoning. 3D Modeling benchmark quickly shows spatial, logic and code performance of the model so I think it's a very good indicator of the quality. Here are th
18.
by ponyous 4mo ago
Basically double from Opus 4.8 IIRC
19.
by ponyous 4mo ago
> Surprisingly written by a human :) Article ends with this
20.
by ponyous 4mo ago
Bun is(was?) a lot about performance. How does it compare to zig?
21.
by ponyous 4mo ago
I've run a tons of benchmarks for OpenSCAD for all kinds of models and setups, and what I realised is: - Models are very jagged (might excel in one type of 3d model, but not another) - Gemini models are the least jagged in my experienc
22.
by ponyous 4mo ago
I've seen this and other attempts like this[0] while exploring improvements for my CAD AI[1]. And I think these are potentially powerful solutions, but none of the current projects/weights have enough training (data or time) to ma
23.
by ponyous 5mo ago
Seems like Chinese labs are the only ones that are trustworthy (at least when it gets to this specific issue). This feels so ironic haha
24.
by ponyous 5mo ago
The site is currently unavailable 503 so I can't read it. But I wonder, what should you consent to? Every dependency? Every dependency above 1GB?
25.
by ponyous 5mo ago
Kimi is nowhere near GPT or Opus unfortunately. I really wish it was. I’m running evals where models have to generate code that produces 3D models and it’s obvious that it lacks spatial understanding and makes many more code errors before i
26.
by ponyous 5mo ago
Gregor! Not sure I want to say more on here.
27.
by ponyous 5mo ago
Been following you guys a while, seems like you've been gaining some traction recently, lets goo and congrats! I have been working on GrandpaCAD[0] for a while, a very similar product. I thought of you as my biggest competitors but not
28.
by ponyous 5mo ago
Another library I have to integrate and benchmark against OpenSCAD for my AI SaaS[0]. I am really curious how constructive solid geometry compares to sketching and extruding that CadQuery is build on. Anyone curious in the writeup? I have a
29.
by ponyous 5mo ago
Why does M1 Max project significantly higher revenue than M3 Max with double the ram?
30.
by ponyous 6mo ago
http://grandpacad.com - 3D Modeling tool intended for creating 3D prints. AI based. Allows for dimensionally accurate parts as well as organic shapes. I massively improve it every month. Pretty proud of it.

More ›