Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pompino
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
151.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
>Fly by Wire has a good safety record. Because there are dozens of people helping keep each plane safe.
152.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
But no ejection seats to escape a collision.
153.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
It is not a serious argument when you malign the character of half the worlds population by extrapolating one anecdote.
154.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Okay, thanks for replying. I know its probably hard or impossible to come by the actual hiring numbers, so I was curious.
155.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
>Meta vs. other FAANGs, and that lets us guess (pretty accurately) how much hiring is actually happening at these companies. What is the data to support this?
156.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
A low sub base liking/commenting will keep your video somewhat relevant to the algo for recommendation. So you'll have a chunk of subs that stay the same, and a percentage of new viewers. Granted that will also cap your total view
157.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
I don't know what your definition of healthy economy is. 90% of startups fail, but people still do it. Is that healthy? Aside - The numbers are a lot more sane than I thought. I think its close to 50% the number of young people who wan
158.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
I wonder if monetization with a low subscriber base isn't as hard as we imagine. Afterall, you just need to net like 80K in a non HCOL city to live very comfortably. (assuming no employees, or office rent, or expensive production)
159.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
That is true, but I'd say that its no different when you're starting any new venture by yourself with the goal of being sustainable. The entertainment business is rough, but it's even harder to sell tangible goods/servic
160.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Middle-class?! The only people purchasing personal EVs are rich people; giving them tax subsidies doesn't seem like the best use of my taxes. You think people making minimum wage are driving around in fancy EVs? >If you make all the
161.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
You can't solve everything at once, progress is incremental, and there are several case studies to the contrary. https://www.centreforcities.org/case-study-library/case-stud...
162.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
>You can say that pretty much about any personal items -- laptop, phone, clothes, shoes, even your house. Manufacturing them cause harm to the environment and they're idle most of the time. Some of your clothes may stay unused for y
163.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Personal cars (EV or otherwise) incur a huge carbon tax to manufacture, are difficult to recycle, and are idle during most of the day. You're welcome to your opinion.
164.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
There is no benefit to public transport when EV companies gets our tax money to build their charger network, or offering thousands of dollars of tax credit to rich folks to buy EVs. >In the end people will buy EVs because they are cheape
165.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Improving public transportation is a far superior solution than forcing people to buy EV cars by outlawing gas engines. For the median income in the US, or person working minimum wage - all of this is pie-in-the-sky elite talk. EVs are esse
166.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
It is not legal to use it without activating it indefinitely.
167.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Its true that you are able to pirate windows. It is not legal to use it without activating it indefinitely.
168.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Its true that you are able to pirate windows. It is not legal to use it without activating it indefinitely.
169.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
A quick google search reveals that no, Microsoft has not given up on making money on Windows - it generates billions of dollars of revenue. I don't know what you're referring to with the .ISO - I have never heard of this.
170.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
I think the 'molotov cocktail' solution is for PC makers to ship with ad-block installed by default. PCs these days ship with all kinds of shitty anti-virus and crappy addons, but somehow they're shy to tackle the ad-based &q
171.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
I think monetization via ads makes all platforms tangibly worse over time. Google, while not directly responsible, is definitely the catalyst that made everything shitty on the web. I, for one would love to see Google go out of business, bu
172.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
I'm pretty sure someone who has accumulated deep knowledge and expertise on NSE gets paid a lot more for their time. Unless you're talking about ChatGPT computational time?
173.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
People have come up with vastly different answers to this question. That to me heavily implies "i don't know" is the only right answer at this time. "Researchers have come up with wide-ranging estimates for how many spec
174.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
With statistics you can estimate anything and everything, in multiple ways. I'll start giving due importance to this approach when the 9 million number is shown to be accurate. Until then, color me skeptical.
175.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Its a good idea in theory, but visibility is poor below 1000m or so, cameras are useless without light, and flood lights have limited range.
176.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
That is an interesting opinion, what sort of knowledge are referring to ?
177.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Its a mostly made-up number, until all of them are actually identified.
178.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
I think we're socially primed for it right now - at-least here in the US. Unlike other cultures where you're living with a large family or extended family or your parents, etc, life in the US is getting to be more and more solitar
179.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
>Fund meaningful work, not gravy for corporate performance artists (Part D is funded by general revenues, beneficiary premiums, and state contributions). The problem is that nobody actually knows or can predict what "meaningful work
180.
▲
by
pompino
3y ago
Because fundamentally most of science is a dead-end. Most of drug discovery is a further dead end with a 90% failure rate. Nobody wants to pay for it, and big-pharma uses a few blockbuster products to pay for all their other failures.
More ›