Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
polygamous_bat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
> What are your thoughts on diffusion policy line of work? It's been interesting, for sure! More robust than ACT as long as you are not using action chunking (has the same problem as ACT). Downside is, it can be too slow/requir
62.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
> I don't think ACT (unlike MPC) have an explicit use case for different embodiment. Or what do you mean by two different instances? I mean two different Aloha setups (2 x 2x WidowX) in the same lab. This is the very minimal level o
63.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
> A PhD in ML is worth less to me than day to day operational product engineering experience utilizing the fast changing ML tooling landscape This is how you get a four-week transition from "I can fix twitter search in an internship
64.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
> would geohot have been better to have gone to school to learn this and deferred all the work he has done? Could you remind me what he has done since his jailbreaking day, i.e. in the last ten years, that can't be described as &quo
65.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Bigger issue with offline RL in the real world (I.e. not Atari video games) has been the assumption of reward labeling. Who’s giving you reward labels at scale? In my opinion that’s why we haven’t seen any large scale real world success sto
66.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
You may enjoy this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14619
67.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
I am talking about the accumulated error part near the end of the article, so your (uncharitable) assumption is not correct.
68.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
That is not the only problem however, because if it were self driving would be solved by 2018. The problem is central to using ML tricks for anything: when you use maximum likelihood estimates for training anything, you get no guarantees fo
69.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
The problem with ACT is very similar to the problem with MPC: if your forward model of the world is not great, it will come back to bite you. So much so that afaik ACT policies can have difficulty transferring between two instances of the s
70.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
As someone who is doing robotics and behavior cloning for a while, it’s incredibly funny to see the self-taught genius rediscover what’s been known in the field for 30 years and can be found by walking in to the first two lectures of any de
71.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Expiry of near zero interest rate.
72.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Here’s a question for you: why do we punish people who have already committed a crime? As a deterrence. This may as well be making an example of a whistleblower to signal potential future whistleblowers to stay silent.
73.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
TLDR is its fair use when Google takes your data and stealing when you reverse engineer their “intellectual property” /s
74.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Wasn’t the tweet recommendation system “open sourced” as well? Does this guy know the difference between open source and “open source”?
75.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
> This is commonly refered to as a market working as intended. Is it? Seems like market is unable to separate wheat from the chaff and is just throwing money around hoping to hit the jackpot. While AI has massive chance of affecting our
76.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Perhaps a cure for venture capitalist FOMO for not having invested in AI?
77.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
You've never seen a high school or a college newspaper?
78.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
This reminds me of a quip I heard on twitter and found quite funny. “Elon is the stupid people’s fantasy of what being smart is like, just like Trump can be a poor person’s fantasy of what being rich is like.” Don’t agree entirely in the po
79.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
A great way to be transparent would be to admit that some enormous egos prevented work that should be open from being open, and counterfactually opening them up. Sure, it may piss off microsoft, but statistically things that piss off micros
80.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Once again, it’s a literary device; you’re doing the same thing when you call it “doomsaying”. The goal of it is to evoke a certain emotion out of the reader, which is fine in a discussion. Otherwise any conversation would be dry as a docto
81.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
So many of us know about Goodhart’s law but willfully ignorant about how that applies to modern economies. We made money to be the metric we judge things by, and now we get to enjoy or suffer the results of overoptimization on that metric.
82.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Hyperbole is often (successfully) used as a literary device to express sentiments. Is there a sentiment expressed in the parent comment you don’t agree with? Then let’s talk about that instead of the form of the argument.
83.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
When I think about falling trust in so called “mainstream” media, pieces like these come to mind. Used to be that newspapers were the fourth estate, existing independently and keeping powers in check by being a source of transparency. Now i
84.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Since log(xy) = log(x) + log(y), you can simply calculate sum(log2(i) for i in range(1, 53)) :) might be a nicer formulation for when you don’t have arbitrary precision support.
85.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Even if you’re talking to your next door landlord and coming up with a joint price, it’s collusion.
86.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Thanks for braving the crowd here, you will unfortunately only find hard questions. Anyway, about my second question: why are the videos only half second ish long? Does the model unravel after that? Also > This is the first version of so
87.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Who knows, maybe it will be web4 or web5 even, this time around.
88.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
What is the video resolution, 64x64? And even then it becomes blurry. Seems like another Google flag-plant-y paper filled with hot air that we will never see the source code or model for because it will expose how poor its capabilities are
89.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Firstly, do these models learn a good physics grounding for nonsense actions? Like keep pressing down even when you are in the ground? Or will they phase you through the ground? Secondly, why are all videos like half a second long? I though
90.
▲
by
polygamous_bat
3y ago
Are elderly or disabled people "normal" in your book? Do you see yourself or your loved ones growing old someday?
More ›