polyanos

5 ms·

1.
by polyanos 4y ago
I have a old ass GTX1070 and run it just fine, it's not the fastest but it works. A lot of these cases are just PEBCAK's and should just be removed from the internet, it's been made so easy that a literal child could install
2.
by polyanos 4y ago
Not that surprising though, they pretty much own OpenAI and probably had a lot sooner full API access to DALL-E(-2).
3.
by polyanos 5y ago
>Take a look at the video demo. It takes natural text in a box and generates code. Copilot was super-autocomplete, so the interface was writing code in an IDE that it filled out for you. No it wasn't, you can literally describe, in
4.
by polyanos 5y ago
That still needs work though, it messed up the "Make every fifth line bold" pretty bad. Still, it showed it could adapt to a new API pretty well.
5.
by polyanos 5y ago
It is only able to translate small instructions into code. I think it will take a while to get to a situation where you can just give it a list of requirements and it spits a working program. Hell it messed up when they gave it the instruct
6.
by polyanos 5y ago
I found the whole UI/sandbox they created the most interesting part. Now don't get me wrong, the tech is certainly great and all, but I really didn't had the feeling I watched/learned more than I already knew from what w
7.
by polyanos 6y ago
While at least on subject, it was quite a pain to read in my opinion.
8.
by polyanos 6y ago
That's actually kinda cute, and oddly off putting at the same time. I really am curious now in what happens back-end, in the model itself, and if it is actually learning. Really should follow Gwern and his circle, it's a lot bette
9.
by polyanos 6y ago
>I've also seen a couple demonstrations of people generating simple apps with just a description. And yet none of those people have released a demo, even though some said they would, multiple times. I'm still quite sceptical at
10.
by polyanos 6y ago
But at that moment, when you create specialized prompt to get a specialized result, aren't you doing most of the work for it.
11.
by polyanos 6y ago
>Why do you believe they won't release the model? It's Open AI after all. Because they want to commercialize the model "to cover the costs of research", it's stated in their blog post FAQ[0]. >Google already t
12.
by polyanos 6y ago
You know, this week I've been fascinated by a GPT-3 implementation writing HTML/React code, but, as you said, that is coming from a YC Alumni, so there might be actually some truth about the OpenAI press "conspiracy" the
13.
by polyanos 6y ago
Really am interested in how complex these "GPT-3 generated" apps can be, but I'm afraid it will stay nothing more than a (cool) gimmick until we can actually fine-tune the model. And even then I still have my doubts. Neverthe
14.
by polyanos 6y ago
I think you are over selling it, sure we are gonna use some new tools but I don't think schools nor teachers are gonna disappear just yet. Education is more than just learning theories from a book/site/app/whatever.
15.
by polyanos 6y ago
I can see GPT-3 being used in a tool/add-on ala Intellisense or Tabnine, but as something to create "a way for anyone to ship a functional web app just by describing what it should do in natural language" (quoted from his web