poloniust

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by poloniust 4y ago

   That's a rather lazy dismissal, seems that you don't like having your beliefs challenged, and will say anything to avoid considering a different point of view. Perhaps you can explain which parts of my comment you think are factua
2. 2.▲
   by poloniust 4y ago

   Which parts of my comment do you believe are dubious, and why? If we look at the eradication of female-only spaces, for example, the reasoning behind this is that proponents of transgenderism want women's spaces to be based on self-dec
3. 3.▲
   by poloniust 4y ago

   It's a response to this: > trans women are a subversion of traditional gender roles And this: > Exactly. The traditional gender roles come out of the tradition of patriarchal exploitation of women, If you think it's nons
4. 4.▲
   by poloniust 4y ago

   If you've nothing to say other than shallow dismissal, why bother commenting?
5. 5.▲
   by poloniust 4y ago

   The irony of transgenderism is that it's just yet another form of patriarchal exploitation of women, in its drive to eradicate female-only spaces, in encouraging actual female women to mutilate themselves to reach some twisted ideal of