polocode

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by polocode 2mo ago

   Sorry, currently high traffic, please try again
2. 2.▲
   Show HN: Budgethole.com – Close the US federal deficit yourself(budgethole.com)

   2 points by polocode 2mo ago|2 comments
3. 3.▲
   Our world is full of slop(refactoringorgs.com)

   9 points by polocode 2mo ago|2 comments
4. 4.▲
   by polocode 6y ago

   Beautiful technical solution. Wouldn’t it depend on all website creators and all browser makers to pretty much commit to changes in their code at the same time, before the first consent banner would actually go away? How do you get them to
5. 5.▲
   by polocode 6y ago

   Honestly, I think it is our job as the creators/hackers to come up with a better solution. The problem is very real, and needs to be fixed. But no good solution has ever been created by lawyers. Ever. So here we are, left with a forest
6. 6.▲
   by polocode 9y ago

   please elaborate
7. 7.▲
   by polocode 10y ago

   I totally agree: Developers should show more backbone in situations like these. The "too costly" mantra really is ridiculous, exactly. Maybe we also need to make sure the people trusted with hiring other people learn that their jo
8. 8.▲
   by polocode 10y ago

   I don't think its a baby Google thingy. The costs associated with hiring the wrong person are huge. But its not only the money - it really is a pain in the ass and most people trusted with hiring other people at a startup have made man