Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pointernil
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
"As they say, hate the game, not the player." Why? Change the quite strong word "hate" to something less extreme and polarizing and then let's discus why it is OK, acceptable and not out right destructive to setup a
32.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
I'd like to add a perspective to the posts questioning the "power law" and it's consequences in this area. "Gesinnungs Ethik" VS "Verantwortungs-Ethik" (very roughly 'unquestioned attitude'
33.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Is there any information on the guaranties Moxie Marlinspike/Whisper Systems provide on the Apps downloaded from the App-Store? I get that their source is open and reviewed and trusted but what is this worth when there is no way to tel
34.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Same here. A strange mixture of "Man in the Highcastle" cross "Better of Ted" vibe /scnr
35.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Am I the only one having "issues" with Enterprises deciding to turn on usage of MY resources for their benefit by default? aka opt-out vs opt-in? I mean how much bandwidth and connected costs ms things to save themselves by this f
36.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Wow, chillax boy! You did overlook the ";)", right? I did not intend to pluck that string of yours. Sorry about that.
37.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
That's really fascinating and interesting and educating. Now every other http server implementation should need to explain every byte it is larger and every ms it is slower it terms of "why?" and "what for?" and &qu
38.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
This. To me this -) is a sign of an area or areas of still not recognized core problems leading to tackling it from different angles -) it could be connected to the average age of developers in the field responsible for the choice of their
39.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
... imagine coming back from this to a power-point presentations in your office.
40.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Yea! To get the js-css-trickster-folks on board the first version works 'obviously' by splitting an image into the shadow and non-shadow parts offline . The result gets recombined in the browser by overlaying them and using some
41.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
To prevent confusion and to stay consistent with my nick, I suggest: "Piper pied"
42.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
First! We need a cool name! ;)
43.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
An idea breading for long time already: in image compression, wouldn't a processing pass subtracting such a raw approximation of the image from the actual image allow for better compression? Is this used in any of the actually used ima
44.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Way too late to the party, but this cries simply for it: How would this guys argue against this way of thinking about consciousness: Michael Graziano, evolution and non-magic description of consciousness https://www.youtube.com&#
45.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Hmm, imagine nature evolving "non-technological" creatures capable of space-flight... but I better leave the reasons for and implications of such developments to ppl. like N. Stephenson ;)
46.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
I would like to suggest to anyone actually providing non-corrupt lobbying services to rename their line of work. Even if legal and ethical definitions of "lobbying" exists, they exist only in the minds of knowledgeable minorities
47.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
As an European I often wonder, how do people in the US cope with this level of corporate driven politics... I have the impression in Europe this kind of connections do exists but are seen as a serious problem and actively worked against in
48.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
.) Love it. .) I can imagine teaching playing piano changed to use something like this simply because it provides such a pleasant and so rewarding experience of accomplishment in contrast to what the "usual" way of learning the in
49.
▲
The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness
(journal.frontiersin.org)
4 points
by
pointernil
11y ago
|
0 comments
50.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Several cars on a highway moving in one direction. On a one lane highway several cars can move forward, one after the other concurrently . On a two lane highway on each lane several cars can move forward one after the other concurrently
51.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Is it just me or does David Krakauer sound A LOT like Joe Armstrong of Erlang fame? ;) Thanks for this very insightful link. Worth every minute.
52.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
I think your statements are a little too general, even though you might have a point here: What does it tell about the the real life "interoperability" on the .net platform, when every language needs all the features? My guess wou
53.
▲
by
pointernil
11y ago
Nice. At what point would it make more sense to just leave c# as it is and move on to a new "language"? I like all the changes and more importantly I guess I actually understand the intention and the need for them, at same time I&
54.
▲
So did anyone actually take less? (Silicon Valley, S02E01)
(imdb.com)
2 points
by
pointernil
11y ago
|
0 comments
55.
▲
by
pointernil
12y ago
Sure. I see a problem with this when ppl. who are not scientifically trained use the same metaphor or get this presented by science journalism as it is "pushing" them into wrong 'beliefs' about intentionality of non cons
56.
▲
by
pointernil
12y ago
That is not the argument people are stating. First, the problem is how absurdly low the wages have fallen in Germany compared with the 'productivity' gains leading to highly profitable exports. Second, a problem seams to be as wel
57.
▲
by
pointernil
12y ago
Which loopholes did stay open in this one?
58.
▲
by
pointernil
12y ago
Level Next: make it speak. Chose an appropriate text like some philosophical speech by Bender ;)
59.
▲
by
pointernil
12y ago
Kudos for differentiating between those 3! ;) I personally don't believe that invention and commercialization as suggested by this equitation (maybe not intentionally) are equally important, beneficial, meaningful. I'd say: Innova
60.
▲
by
pointernil
12y ago
Yes, so it would need more than re-targeting the eyes, but maybe still less than being able to apply an arbitrary expression... Could be fun for Chat-Masks with Facial-Expressions though. Ready Player One / OASIS here we come ;)
More ›