Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
point78
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
So improve public transport and pedestrian areas. OP wants to create multilevel highways.
32.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
For starters it means not integrating them into a country with concentration camps, kills journalists, suppresses dissent Hong Kong was a democracy, it getting eaten up by China is horrendous.
33.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
This makes no sense whatsoever and probably one of the worst ideas I ever read on HN. Banning cars works very well along with pedestrian streets and public transport in Europe.
34.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
how will we get to space of we kill ourselves first
35.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Don't fool yourself, the West has it too but we don't publish it. (And anyway look at cctv in london)
36.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Ok and your first point, but your second point...That's exactly what a free trial is by definition. It's free for a period of days until you are a paying member.
37.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
I fail to see the problem here. There are dozens of these apps offered for free, some the developer decides to charge per month. User just has to find the free ones. Should Google now tell app developers what to charge? That's ridic
38.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Does the internet count
39.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Troll, you're making 0 sense. Socialism and government works very well when done correctly (north europe). Take away government you'll just have kings and queens. You think they would respect your rights and/or life. You mu
40.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
>They do not have the ability to compel people to surrender to unlimited search They dont? Says who? Who the heck do you think will have power to do whatever they want whenever they want? You think the 1% will distribute wealth and powe
41.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
So you prefer to go back to kings and emperors? Without the state we will all be slaves to someone.
42.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
I think we're all specifically asking how the heck you monetize extensions
43.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
The only important question is what is his revenue
44.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Carr to elaborate
45.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
So because your little experience in a tiny state in the middle of nowhere on a planet of 7 billion people is good, it means the entire planet is good. Got it.
46.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Ah I see now. Yes.
47.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
The keywords in my sentence was "american" and "eastern european" EE is known for sex trafficking young beautiful women and mainly in Europe. That an American has his hands on them is even stranger.
48.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
The keywords in my sentence was "american" and "eastern european" EE is known for sex trafficking young beautiful women and mainly in Europe. That an American has his hands on them is even stranger.
49.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
A 60 year old American financier who's uglier than a frog has 2 teenage eastern european models as "assistants"....does that add up to you?
50.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
This was just as true 30 years ago also
51.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Yes they are, but you're leaving out the most important point here. It's content SPECIFICALLY designed for babies. The onus is on the producer - whether it's toys, videos, ads - for us to have some regulation saying x is ok
52.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Do you have kids?
53.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Completely wrong, everything targeted at children (for decades) is regulated. If your kid is watching Sesame Street on PBS and an ad for The Sopranos appears - that does not happen for a reason. Uploading cartoon nursery rhymes and having
54.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Free. Just like public broadcasting system is free and when watching Sesame Street an ad for The Wire (Or whatever came up) will not happen.
55.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Cartoon nursery rhymes directed at as low as even 1 year olds will sometimes have ads popup for a tv show containing drugs and guns. Completely inappropriate! EVERYTHING that deals with children whether directly or indirectly is strictly r
56.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Brilliant and morally acceptable are definitely two different things
57.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Google needs to be clear on what causes apps to be removed, and based on account history should be way more lenient on what would cause account termination... I.e. 4 years good standing 3 strikes, 5 years good standing 4 strikes, etc
58.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Say anything you want is a lie. Let's see some real hate speech in a column targeted at minorities. You won't. So why should it be tolerated for any group.
59.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Do it. Not sure why you're being downvoted
60.
▲
by
point78
7y ago
Well as screwed up as the system is one little part of why prices are so high is to cover when people don't pay.
More ›