Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pohl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
421.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
That makes sense: it's not a game at all, but a simulation pretending to be one.
422.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Paging hugoblanc, who has a heroic 14334 +1 comments out there: what drives you?
423.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
This is a sweet idea and a nice, game-esque implementation. It could definitely use some onboarding. There's nothing to give the "player" a hint as to what they should do. What is my goal? Am I trying to defeat the communic
424.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Measurements are evidence.
425.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
What’s the counter-narrative? That the sudden, rapid temperature swing only coincidentally happened after the industrial revolution but were somehow going to happen anyway? That the greenhouse effect is a woke myth?
426.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
How much of it do they need to spend on healthcare?
427.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Yeah, using quotation marks when paraphrasing is super confusing. Still, paraphrasing what or whom? I guess I'd need to know a working definition for environmental terrorism. I've heard of eco-terrorism before, but that's g
428.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
If I search for your quotation — "worst case of environmental terrorism in modern history" — Google only surfaces this thread. Whose assessment were you citing, and what did they actually say?
429.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Yes: https://waxy.org/2023/07/twitter-bug-causes-self-ddos-possib...
430.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
...a fictional scenario using an actual person's identity without their knowledge, even.
431.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Regardless of the decision, it's strange that someone used a real person's identity to use as a fictional "customer" in the filing. https://newrepublic.com/article/173987/mysterious-case-fake-..
432.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
What's the deal with the "customer" in this case having been fabricated? You can just create fictional customers in court filings now? https://newrepublic.com/article/173987/mysterious-case-fake-...
433.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Is it overtly a hypothetical? My understanding is that the "customer" in the case may have been fabricated. https://newrepublic.com/article/173987/mysterious-case-fake-...
434.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
I'm chuffed to be praised with such faint critique.
435.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
So much of the world's wealth is already in the wrong hands. What's a little more?
436.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Preferring a euphemism doesn’t make it a different thing.
437.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
So affirmative action for children of wealthy alumni, then.
438.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Even under that different defining characteristic, the analogue would be the same modern event: the recording that gives lie to the cover-up narrative that he had used his psychic declassification superpowers.
439.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
There's no way that could be Watergate-squared. The defining characteristic of Watergate was the audio tapes, so this has to be a reference to the "Bring some Cokes in, please" recording.
440.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Really? Not the fake elector scheme? Or the attempt to overturn the results of the last election? Or the willful retention of classified documents and the attempts to evade returning them? Any one of those would be better candidates for wat
441.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Yeah, I think the author believes that if he recognizes the trick then it must be the case that pulling-off the trick was easy, and therefore cheap. I went through a phase like that after discovering the TV Tropes wiki and saw all the patt
442.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Alas, it’s too easy judge conviction incorrectly — by mannerisms, posture, swagger, tone of voice, etc. and are misled by well-coached imposters. Worse, many seem to prefer candidates with loads of apparent conviction in terrible things. Ad
443.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
OTOH, folk who use confidence & apparent conviction as signifiers of voteworthiness also can’t really know what they’re getting.
444.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
You can control the coarseness by rubbing it between your fingers as you apply it. You may have seen video of chefs doing this.
445.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
They do, but what they owe differs by what part of the government one is dealing with. You’ll find that, with regards to the military, one thing they do not owe to citizens is real-time, unfettered access to intelligence.
446.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
That’s not enough to justify the grinder. Buy a box of Diamond Crystal Kosher salt. It has the perfect texture for keeping in a salter on the counter so it’s easy to grab a pinch.
447.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
So — pornography, then.
448.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Can’t wait to hear why the free speech absolutists say this must be protected.
449.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
Does the first sentence here help narrow it down? https://oceangate.com/about.html
450.
▲
by
pohl
3y ago
I'm surprised that desire/ability to raise prices doesn't get a representation in that formula. The consumer isn't the only party with agency, after all.
More ›