poelzi

12 ms·

61.
by poelzi 9y ago
I follow the BSM-SG model, which also has no dark matter to explain galaxy rotations. Disclaimer: I choose my models after reduction of assumptions and stricter logic is better (Solomonoff Induction). Secondly, I understood when studying ph
62.
by poelzi 9y ago
Unfortunately my A&H Xone:K2 does not have a 24 bit DAC so I can't really test with equipment and songs I know. I think people who like vinyl more the CD just like the noise floor on top of the music and not that vinyl actually has
63.
by poelzi 9y ago
Wrong. Many good Lables release 24 bit mastering quality flac releases, better as CD. But, to hear a difference, you really need highest quality equipment and even then, depends on the sound. I hear the different of flac vs mp3 on my Shure
64.
by poelzi 9y ago
I only buy music on bandcamp these days. Usually 200-300 Euros a month, because I know the artists get most of the share. I really really really must be needy for some song that I go to beatport or some other service. I find it unbearable t
65.
by poelzi 9y ago
I"m shocked that this is even forbidden in the "land of the free". I was walking home alone from school. In fact, my father once said to me that I basically raised myself on my own.
66.
by poelzi 9y ago
:) The problem with physics is, that it went into the wrong direction in the last 100 years and as a result, everybody which looks beyond pop science papers knows, that it does not fucking fit. The fine-tuned Universe is a Problem of the mo
67.
by poelzi 9y ago
From the perspective I gathered through understanding a very beautiful unified theory (not my model) - this is exactly my point. EM waves as we use it are useless for long distance communications. I even doubt that those waves will still be
68.
by poelzi 9y ago
That is not what I meant. Both are objectively measurable results - of course if you look at critic voices the details in their implementation differ, but in general yes. But there are different ways of implementing something and which one
69.
by poelzi 9y ago
The fermi paradox bothered me quite a bit, like all paradoxes and they should bother everybody. They are a flag that something does not add up and there must be some sort of wrong assumption somewhere. As most of our combined "knowledg
70.
by poelzi 10y ago
beta factor is bad. stellerator is better, but still wrong approach to fusion. It really depends on the physical model you use - I don't think in the Standard Model anymore - it's falsified and there are better models out there.
71.
by poelzi 10y ago
Based on a certain model of fusion based on a theoretical model based on certain assumptions. You know that one falsification is enough to break any model and the standard mode has been falsified over and over again. This means that you can
72.
by poelzi 10y ago
In fact, we have two fundamental bad/wrong assumptions in both theories and that's why they can never be united without going into mathematical/physical mumbojumbo like strings theory. In fact, humans build unified models tha
73.
by poelzi 10y ago
But somehow we still believe in models that have 30+ free changeable constants. Big Bang Theory for example.
74.
by poelzi 10y ago
it's called the loading factor in this experiment. For 100 pd atoms you need et least 85 D. Best output is ~0.93-.95 and breaks down after wards.
75.
by poelzi 10y ago
> To my knowledge nobody has yet been able to reproduce the original claims, but I haven't followed in a while. http://lenr-canr.org/index/Summary/Summary.php It has multiple times. But if you really spend
76.
by poelzi 10y ago
I don't care, I only eat good chocolate
77.
by poelzi 10y ago
5 years ago, I would have thought that ITER is a step in the right direction. After studying alternative physical model and looking into more logical sun models that explain more while require less assumptions, I came to the conclusion that
78.
by poelzi 10y ago
For those who do not care about paradigms and use the Solomonoff induction (Occam's razor) and falsification as a guiding principle: After carefully checking basic assumptions made long ago against newer research, als well as using a d
79.
by poelzi 10y ago
surprisingly not http://vixra.org/pdf/1107.0031v1.pdf But yes I know, a crackpots physical model... how bad it fits so well.
80.
by poelzi 10y ago
if your compression can compress your encrypted data, you should change your encryption mechanism to something that actually works...
81.
by poelzi 10y ago
backup was on the todo list for next week
82.
by poelzi 10y ago
I wish USA the best with its mentally 5 year old president... what could possibly go wrong.
83.
by poelzi 10y ago
Nice !!! just browsing through the indy scifi section showed Primer and Upstream Color, two of my favorite movies :)
84.
by poelzi 10y ago
Basic income requires a different financial model. Inflationary fiat money is a terrible idea, especially with banking controlling the creation process. I like plan-b as a quite comprehensive model, but I would separate scientific funding a
85.
by poelzi 10y ago
because the only thing that can save us is better physical understanding. Think about it: we have 2, 3 major problems. We need massive amounts of clean energy, something with 95% availability and not with batteries. If someone brings up a r
86.
by poelzi 10y ago
No, of course not. My opinion is based on many other papers and understanding of a very different model.
87.
by poelzi 10y ago
Like many stuff in theoretical physics - hey, most of the physical model is rather unlikely. They not even have a proper arrow of time in the standard model nor can they predict the spectral gap with certainty along a long list of problems.
88.
by poelzi 10y ago
I go with limits of growth, as it has been shown to fit the last 30 years. http://sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/M... I also think Guy McPhearson is right in many aspects: https:&#x
89.
by poelzi 10y ago
The BSM model is testable in every aspect. That the basic building blocks are just fucking small compared to a neutrino for example, is a physical problem. The model does not prevent you from measuring it, quite the contrary compared to man
90.
by poelzi 10y ago
You pulling most out of context. The theory is here: http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitati... Most of your points are taken out of context. If you don't understand the model, they don't make

More ›