poelzi

17 ms·

31.
by poelzi 7y ago
Those mangeled protons are not anti-protons. They are not stable but only a Proton with damaged outer shell (the one that breaks at 5 MeV). Get it stable like the Proton and we talk again. When real antimatter gets destroyed it looks like t
32.
by poelzi 7y ago
At some point you can't fix a model by adding more stuff to it, if it's already inconsistent. Removing the wrong assumptions first, helps more then adding new mechanisms.
33.
by poelzi 7y ago
Stoyan Sarg understood this problem in the 90 and fixed it by building a model from scratch that actually works :)
34.
by poelzi 7y ago
QM is fundamentally not correct. They assume energy and matter is interchangeable, which is not. Build me a proton from energy and I will shut up, you can't. The appearance of positions can be explained much much much much easier, once
35.
by poelzi 7y ago
Full Ack. Unfortunately training against confirmation bias (or other ones) is not part of any scientific study. We in general give very little attention to papers that falsify an accepted theory. For example, look at the papers http:/
36.
by poelzi 7y ago
Bullshit, crises in astronomy for example. The Big Bang Bullshit has be falsified for years now. http://cosmology.info has links to dozens of papers. Show me one paper that measured Lorenz contraction, you can't because it
37.
by poelzi 7y ago
They don't understand the dirac see and how field lines work, nor how a CL node operates when it's in magnetic mode. In fact, they even think that you can describe EM with vector math, which is half bollocks. Maxwell tried to form
38.
by poelzi 7y ago
Physics took 2 wrong roads and it got stuck in a local minima of the truth plane. Understanding that physics is the most ignorant field of science and how proud the field is of it's models, I don't think this will come anytime soo
39.
by poelzi 7y ago
They will find dark-matter when they unify GR and QM, never :)
40.
by poelzi 7y ago
I know they don't understand λ_spm, I know their quantum orbit is totally fucked up. I know that they don't understand short magnetic field condition. I know their particle sizes are all off. (Reason you can' unify QM and GR
41.
by poelzi 7y ago
You are absolutely right. I personally have adopten the BSM-SG (developed by Dr. Stoyan Sarg) model which puts very strict limits on the superposition concept. No particle is ever at two places at once nor does it jump around. The model is
42.
by poelzi 7y ago
Our physics model is fundamentally broken and this list is the result of the internal discrepancies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_p... A adopted a very fringe, unified physics model. From
43.
by poelzi 7y ago
I"m into that topic before it became mainstream, long term /r/collapse reader. To be honest, I don't think there will be a rebuild after this one. No water, no food and wet bulb temperatures over 35 °C for many hours a d
44.
by poelzi 7y ago
Lots of civilizations around that time collapapsed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRcu-ysocX4
45.
by poelzi 7y ago
Maybe if Hurd decide to rewrite their kernel in rust I would give a s@#!, but since it's still a none usable kernel after decades of debugging and development, maybe it's ripe for /dev/null ?
46.
by poelzi 7y ago
Me too. In fact, I find the prices and especially the flac extra price something from the last millenium, when storage and bandwith where expensive. Also the discography option is so wonderful, it helps with the backlog if you dive into som
47.
by poelzi 7y ago
Bandcamp tags and notifications as well as following people with similar taste. Some reddit subs are also quite helpful
48.
by poelzi 7y ago
I use git annex for my library. This way I can easily replicate my 3 TB archive to multiple devices. Since my notebook is size constrained, I can clone my archive and just pull the files I actually need.
49.
by poelzi 7y ago
Badcamp has physical media as well. It's up to the artist to produce and deliver them. Since I find mp3 unacceptable audio quality, especially on PA sound systems, I collect flac only. Many shops have a shitty policy on lossless, thank
50.
by poelzi 7y ago
You solve all the nuclear reactor bullshit by demanding full insurance coverage - nobody can effort this. Problem solved.
51.
by poelzi 8y ago
Sorry, but 1.5 °C is long gone... https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190122104611.h... Just to emphasis the current state: if you would replace every dirty man made machine with something clean, we
52.
by poelzi 8y ago
Sorry, but I have to correct you there. There is a infinite number of Relativistic Models possible. In the one that is currently used, you are indeed right. But now I understand why Einstein wrote in his last book, after much thinking, that
53.
by poelzi 8y ago
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7426 It is proven that physicists are in fact, the most ignorant folks of all scientists. Real, proper physical models are always interdisciplinary, unified theories. The mo
54.
by poelzi 8y ago
I suggest searching for a phage that infects this bacterium.
55.
by poelzi 8y ago
I just recently payed 300 euros for bitwig studio, because it's really good software and works nicely on Linux. I looked at the OSS DAWs out there and found them all unusable or just no fun to use.
56.
by poelzi 9y ago
That's not what I said. I said that you need at least 20 something parameters to believe in the Big Bang Theory. You can't prove theories, you can only falsify. With every "prove" you just exclude all theories out of the
57.
by poelzi 9y ago
I started with is papers at reasearch gate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stoyan_Sargoytchev It triggered my curiosity, but I did not understand the model from it. I understood that the perspective is quite diff
58.
by poelzi 9y ago
I really would like that too :( The problem I see is that it just takes to much time for most people to really dig into this to a point where write something as deep as the original theory is possible. As always, working with fringe science
59.
by poelzi 9y ago
One thing I can say for certain: I could have never come up with this model. I'm merely a student of it and so far, it was not contradicted like most other models I encountered so far. Models that are not falsifiable, like string theor
60.
by poelzi 9y ago
For your big bang theory you have to believe in at least 20 free choose able constants that are perfectly balanced. What about an argument for an exchange ?

More ›