Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
podgorniy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
I like your analysis
62.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
These words may mean anything. From "get people extinct" to "make shit ton of money" for myself. What we know for sure he is not commited to people who trusted him or his project. Consider the project dead. He kinda fits
63.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
After this there is an inevitable wave of carcinisation of the agents/AI-centric software https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinisation
64.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
It's another game where software quality, security of novelty is not an outcome-defining factor.
65.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
This is all about PR now. openclaw is inevitable type of software (as cli agents, as context-management software, as new methodologies of structuring sofware for easier AI ingestion, etc). Guy gamed, built it, guy got it. At this point I wo
66.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
It's one of the ways. Trick is to discover what works for you
67.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
Next inevitable step is LLM alchemy. People will be writing crazy-ass prompts which ununderstandable text which somehow get system work better than the straight-human-text prompts.
68.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
I am with you on this one. I've experienced in times of gpt 3, and 3.5 that existence of any, even 1-word system message changed output drastically in the worse direction. I did not verify this behaviour with recentl models. Since then
69.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
If exatly such markdown was written by some Joe from the internet no one would notice it. So these stars exist not because of quality or utility of the text.
70.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
And vendor locking
71.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
I want to see an example of the application with well written documentation which produces well working application based on those docs. I discovered that it is not trivial to conceptualize app to that extent of clarity which is required fo
72.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
The impact from appearing on HN is disproportionately bigger than anything else. It's the endgame.
73.
▲
by
podgorniy
8mo ago
> find and call a carpenter, a plumber when I need him Good luck hoping that none from the big money would try to stand between you and someone giving you a service (uber, airbnb, etsy, etc) and get rent from that.
74.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
They seemingly forgot to ask their "almost-agi-future-of-economics-the-best-thing-ever" to fix the UI...
75.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
> I think the AI folk have generally done a terrible job of connecting the dots to show people what they are actually getting. Confusion and fear are much better for stock prices than clarity
76.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
> Copilot vs other tools is how it's being pushed on us, AI demand goes though. AI investments numbers good. Numbers up. Not because people choose, because corporations are fomo-ing it and we don't have a choise.
77.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Go explain that to the board who assigns you. They all know about AI and FOMO it. Anything non-AI will be burried and thrown away. Trend is not close to reversal yet. We need more AI-driven disasters before rejection of AI-centric course wi
78.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Sounds almost like every manager just covers their ass by formally doing what is expected core top-down idea is "AI is a future, thus make it everywhere". Anyone who would try to say "let's not do AI" would be a whi
79.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
We will have to go through the stage of disillusionment of what AI is and understanding of what it is not. There is too much FOMO and too many stories driven by the heavy-AI-invested parties today to see thing clearly.
80.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Meh. Did not find experai_bot via your search tool. Your search even worse than the one "favouring top 0.1%" as does not give any result even by the strict name (unlike default search does). Good luck anyway. More tools is merrier
81.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Cheers. It's hard to distinguish genuine from non-genuine people online. Especially when they ask things which appear trivial from where one stands. Thanks for having patience.
82.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
> Why not take that away from the firms and let people have local first AI usage? Capital strives for monopoly. Are there money in "local llms" for the capital? Docker had this issue: they gave local stuff, and failed to moneti
83.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
TLDR: user reach and convenience (or avoidance of the inconvenience artificially created by the app store companies to ensure own monopoly). App stores are another source of distribution of the platform. Apps create another engagement chann
84.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Electric cars hype topic is has rotted away. Time to bring new, yet novel for the the public. Now people will belive in the musk stories of the future shaped by the humanoid robots, not shaped by the electric cars. Who cares if in 3 years t
85.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
I guess self-driving will be done by the humanoid robots now
86.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Why would you think reality shows so many people using patreon app?
87.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Reduction in pollution in where EV are used or where produced?
88.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
You're plaing game of "control" the wrong way. The whole idea of all these investments and movement was that they do have the control over the AI, not users
89.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
Replace idea of AI with idea of calculator. Yes, brain is less engaged, and yes, calculator make you calculate stuff faster
90.
▲
by
podgorniy
9mo ago
> saved me SO much time I decided to pay for it AI is subsidized for the users
More ›