podgorniy

6 ms·

91.
by podgorniy 9mo ago
Level of absurditiy of this is amazing. WT actual F? They invested so much into something what is not obvious brings value? Will there be consequences on them? Or they take the bonus and hide in New Zealand bunker? It's big money betti
92.
by podgorniy 9mo ago
Different foundations of the worldview, thus different values, thus different reprenestations of these values shown through heroes. We don't realize what are foundations of our worldview as they aren't appearing in a contrast-enou
93.
by podgorniy 9mo ago
> It should be easy for the user to discern the factual relevance of search query results Is it even possible to structure incentives in such way that this happens? _Without totalitarian dictatorship methods_ if possible please.
94.
by podgorniy 9mo ago
It's impossible that they will loose more money from gone customers than make money from this change
95.
by podgorniy 9mo ago
> it’s easy to tax other people - the rich, bankers, benefits scroungers, energy executives Taxing the working class is the easiest: do vat tax, force income tax. Tere is no way taxing rich or executives is comparably easy. -- Let's
96.
by podgorniy 9mo ago
Cool stuff. Thanks for conceptualizing, implementing and sharing
97.
by podgorniy 9mo ago
Are `sweeping generatlizations` even possible to be representative? If not, then where to draw a line?
98.
by podgorniy 10mo ago
> What exactly is wrong with Americans or for the most part the rest of the world valuing economic performance as a measure of prosperity and progress? Prosperity of the nation? Or average people of the nation? Imagine economy grows. But
99.
by podgorniy 10mo ago
Good for them. During economic downturns, when fewer resources are available for redistribution, collective action across population groups can help address worsening power imbalances.
100.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Great deep analysis and writing. Thanks for sharing.
101.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
> We live in a culture of transparency where you are rewarded for confessing your weaknesses. Where exactly do you observe this?
102.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Now it goes beyond money: they are aiming at shaping societies. From mars colonies (imagine musks tantrums when they vote him out) to project 2025 type of political works. When you have too much money, it's kinda boring to keep making
103.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Right wing activists working with and within government (think taxation, immigration, housing, environment, race, gender) have made a mess of government and society, and are calling anyone who criticizes the current mess as far radical left
104.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Fascism is a form of ultranationalism based on a myth of national rebirth (“we must purge decadence and be born again”), which seeks to create a new, regimented society through authoritarian power and mass mobilization, often embracing viol
105.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Aah, the free market quazimonopolies avoid and despise at all costs (usually carried by customers)
106.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
What could users do with this quazimonopoly? YT PMs can keep being discunnected from user's needs as long and far as their personal worldview limitations allow and bare no consequences.
107.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Back to drawing board! -- ~Don't mind all those trillions of unreturned investments. Taxpayers will bail out the too-bog-to-fail ones.~
108.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Recursion
109.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
2025 -- Read with sarcasm
110.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Struggle is real. Don't take too seriously the ones who incapable to relate.
111.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
For someone without ADHD's `executive disfunction`, one of the code ADHD struggles, this post reads as nonsense. Thus only minority could relate to the post: the ones who have ADHD ones who think they understand ADHD.
112.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
I could not have said it better. We're on the same page with you. I would add that to my opinion if previously code production/management was a limiting factor in software development, today it's not. The conceptualisation (o
113.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
There is sense in your words. Especially in the context of the modern day vocabulary. I though about the concept of this ort of methodology before "agent" (which I would define as "sideeffects with LLM integration") was
114.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
> What's not waterfall about this is lost on me. Exactly. There is a spec, but there is no waterfall required to work and maintain it. Author from the article dismissed spec-based development exactly because they saw resemblance wit
115.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
Agree. I don't use term "spec" as it was with "spec-based development" before llms. There details were required to be defined upfront. With LLMs you can start with vague spec, missing some sections and clarify it wi
116.
by podgorniy 11mo ago
This article if for those who already made up their mind that "spec-based-development" isn't for them. I believe (and practice) that spec-based development is one of the future methodologis for developing projects with LLMs.
117.
by podgorniy 1y ago
What a business/ethical dilemma ~not~ to solve
118.
by podgorniy 1y ago
People's failure to articulate the nature of "thinking" is a perfect demonstration of what "thinking" entails
119.
by podgorniy 1y ago
LLMs are quite good at psychological questions. I've compared AI with tharapy professional responses and they matched 80%. It is is easier to open to it, be frank (so fear of regection or ridicule is no more). And most importantly some
120.
by podgorniy 1y ago
> Smartphones manipulate our emotions and trigger our reflexes Lol. What a way to steer understanding from the cause of this phenomenon. Smartphone is merely a tool used by organisations for achieving own most often financial goals. It&#

More ›