pocketaces

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by pocketaces 8y ago

   The native assembly would obviously not be cross-platform... It would be native...
2. 2.▲
   by pocketaces 8y ago

   You use 32-bit ARM assembly on 32-bit ARM, AArch64 assembly on AArch64, and x86 assembly on x86. There is no handing over a monopoly to anyone. While the mentioned browser functionality have existed for decades, then that does not change th
3. 3.▲
   by pocketaces 8y ago

   There is no need to define anything new. Native assembly already exist for each platform.
4. 4.▲
   by pocketaces 8y ago

   No you don't. The Web as a distribution method has supported the downloading of native applications since forever. Instead of trying so hard to make it so that users don't need to install native applications, then I think that it
5. 5.▲
   by pocketaces 8y ago

   I am just a bit biased when it comes to my perception of most javascript developers. I should probably have left out the quotation marks. That would have made the comment more focused. However, with that being said, then the point is, that
6. 6.▲
   by pocketaces 8y ago

   I hope not. The subset of native (for example, x86) assembly that is equivalent to webassembly is already perfectly secure. You just limit the native assembly to pure computations without any system calls. It will also always be significant