pmlnr

45 ms·

571.
by pmlnr 5y ago
If anyone is about to say that it is to make it easy for newcomers: it's gentoo. It'NEVER easy.
572.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Erm... because you need to follow laws. Your company would file tax records, right? And follow fire and building regulations in the office, correct? So why would it not follow GDPR?
573.
by pmlnr 5y ago
> The problem is that the what actually has to be made portable is not well defined in GDPR Wait, is there anything well defined in GDPR? EDIT: k, so for the downvoters: I mean it. GDPR is muddy at best. Think IP addresses: in most cases
574.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Time will tell. Sadly, in my read, "no general monitoring" and "mandatory upload filters" are not the same, and thus, not mutually exclusive.
575.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Lol. Then how else can it be followed?
576.
by pmlnr 5y ago
> So this does not require Whatsapp/Facebook to proactively monitor its network Welcome to Article 11 & 13: https://juliareda.eu/eu-copyright-reform/
577.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Because someone posted it, and others voted on it.
578.
by pmlnr 5y ago
In the UK, during the purchase of our house we had to take a "chancel liability insurance", because our freehold once belonced to a rectory, so to protect ourselves from repair liability towards a chapel that has been here for cen
579.
by pmlnr 5y ago
systemd-timesyncd is also a lovely possibility of forking it up.
580.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Try https://web.archive.org/web/20160116064222/https://www.wired...
581.
The Usenet War Between alt.tasteless and rec.pets.cats (1994)(wired.com)
11 points by pmlnr 5y ago|3 comments
582.
by pmlnr 5y ago
> IRC had no drama and such crap Your memories got nicer with time. Reminder that the internet was always the internet, from 1994, although the story is about USENET: https://www.wired.com/1994/05/alt-tasteless&
583.
by pmlnr 5y ago
The basis of the whole debacle is that Andrew believes someone can own freenode. Reality is that the domain can be on someone's name, but that doesn't make them the owner - communities have no owners.
584.
by pmlnr 5y ago
prions are one of those things I wish I never started reading about. It's like reading about Lovecraftian gods when you know there's nothing that could protect you if it hits you.
585.
by pmlnr 5y ago
^^^ this If there isn't a legal entity, the thing can't be protected. If there is a legal entity, and you're not officially part of it, then you're not part of it when it comes to scenarios like this. Yes, it sucks. Yes,
586.
by pmlnr 5y ago
IRC == drama since the dawn of time.
587.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Would you mind giving an example of a static file AS, please? I wasn't able to find any.
588.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Rss/atom can be static files, AS can't.
589.
by pmlnr 5y ago
I love how everyone skips the part that freenode's democratically elected former leader was the one who simply sold something they shouldn't have been able to - blame should first be directed at them.
590.
by pmlnr 5y ago
OK, it looks like nobody understood my point, fascinating. Discord is a company. You can look it up, there are contact points - abuse, legal, etc. People who put their community there trust the entity running Discord. I'd prefer to tru
591.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Selling user data?
592.
by pmlnr 5y ago
That's not the point (edit): the only thing I'm missing from libera is an impressum. Mentioning a nameless swedish nonprofit is actually worse in my eyes, than calling it xyz's server in the basement.
593.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Yes. Look where it got us: fb, twitter, reddit, etc taking it all over, because people "trust" them - see ominous zuck quote. Why? Because ordinary people need faces and names. So unless libera is aiming for the oldschool nerds,
594.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Yep. No names, no contact, no impressum, but "trust us, we're the good ones" - right. Than act like it.
595.
by pmlnr 5y ago
"clear your mind" practiced for milennias clears your mind, who would have thiught?
596.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Valuation is based on who farted at wall street.
597.
by pmlnr 5y ago
The pendulum swings back somehow and we'll have offline capable personal computers again.
598.
by pmlnr 5y ago
> By default devices don't send fragmented frames. This means that the mixed key attack and the fragment cache attack, on their own, will be hard to exploit in practice, unless Wi-Fi 6 is used. When using Wi-Fi 6, which is based on
599.
by pmlnr 5y ago
Eh, no. Really no; that typical is at absolute max 50K across the UK.
600.
by pmlnr 5y ago
A webserver, as bare minimum, should be able to serve static files from the disk - but you are correct, there is no such definition, so this is an opinion. Regardless, calling envoy a webserver is misleading: it's both more and less, t

More ›