pmichalina

3 ms·

1.
by pmichalina 8y ago
People using it would beg to differ. Just don’t use their service.
2.
by pmichalina 8y ago
Even just one poorly designed library can cause serious memory issues and trigger a ton of events. Usually it’s the marketing and ad people that throw around this “but they are async loaded”. That’s true, but doesn’t change the the fact tha
3.
by pmichalina 8y ago
Tests are good of course, but that assumes the tests are valid. I’d rather trust compiler to ensure runtime safety.
4.
by pmichalina 8y ago
Throwing is a side effect breaking flow of control for no good reason. It’s takes you down the same path as all other spaghetti code. Not as much elegance as it is about purity. Minimizing side effects is the number one way to reduce bugs.
5.
by pmichalina 8y ago
Assertions, throws, and try-catch are code smells. Really bad design choice considering we have more elegant solutions like monads.
6.
by pmichalina 8y ago
Isn’t this how the web was supposed to work?
7.
by pmichalina 8y ago
“Treating something like a disease” encourages one to not take ownership of the issue but instead provides a mechanism to play victim and give up. It’s victim mentality, denies the concept of freewill, and sets the stage for all sorts of sl
8.
by pmichalina 8y ago
I suppose it’s collapsing up since 2009?
9.
by pmichalina 8y ago
Why not both?
10.
by pmichalina 8y ago
Typical statist mindset.
11.
by pmichalina 8y ago
lodash and moment are poor choices to showcase. lodash is mostly moot with ES6 and beyond. date-fns is a cleaner version of moment.