Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
plopilop
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
plopilop
2y ago
The hegemony of software only accepting . has de facto pushed the standard everywhere for computers, but here in France I still write with a comma, but type with a dot. A few years ago Excel and some other softwares started to be locale dep
32.
▲
by
plopilop
2y ago
> When have gun laws ever stopped a shooting? Have you heard of Australia? https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2018/03/13/gun-l...
33.
▲
by
plopilop
2y ago
> The cost of rent is 30€ per square meter per month in Paris. Only for big enough apartments. 20m² appartements do not go for under 850€, ie around 42€/m². Granted these flats are too small to even have a laundry machine, let alone
34.
▲
by
plopilop
2y ago
Switching one uppercase letter in an otherwise lowercase password adds exactly 1 bit of entropy (per switched letter). On the other hand, any extra lowercase letter will increase the entropy by 4.7 bits (assuming a password on [a-z]). Given
35.
▲
by
plopilop
2y ago
You don't necessary get 100% certainty but the probability of success increases exponentially with each new run. Thus you can get very fast to a probability smaller than you quantum tunnelling through a wall
36.
▲
Turning the screws: The pressure tactics of ransomware gangs
(news.sophos.com)
2 points
by
plopilop
2y ago
|
0 comments
37.
▲
by
plopilop
2y ago
How is this objectively a great feature? This is a spyware that stores screenshots unencrypted (and thus accessible to any other spyware). I am also not convinced that the AI tools would have been offline, thus effectively sharing your whol
38.
▲
Systematic literature review of AI models' impact on security of code generation
(frontiersin.org)
1 points
by
plopilop
2y ago
|
0 comments
39.
▲
by
plopilop
2y ago
Related research: * Why Johnny can't encrypt (1995): https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~tygar/papers/Why_Johnny_Ca... * Why Johnny still can't encrypt (2006): https://cups.cs.cmu.edu/soups
40.
▲
by
plopilop
3y ago
I mean you seem to be simply reducing spying to the GPD, when it varies very much with the policies of a country. Israel is 27th by GDP but is a world leader in espionage, and especially in surveillance tools. Similarly France is good enoug
41.
▲
by
plopilop
3y ago
The convertibility between money and gold has stopped in the 70s. Bitcoin allows for instant money transfer, and so does Visa. The fact that bitcoin has no collateral is a whole other topic.
42.
▲
by
plopilop
3y ago
If you really believe that something that is 1 million times less efficient than Visa/MasterCard for a fraction of the service, and that miners really use residential energy when they are active 24/7 and thus by definition a conti
43.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
I meant "a given orientation of the tile will be present many times (or infinitely many)". It's very probable (I did not read the paper, only their website page) that the tile only occupies a finite amount of orientations in
44.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
The key point (often missed by these articles) is that aperiodic tilings do not have a (infinite) periodic pattern. This means that you cannot draw a shape on these tiles and say: "the tiling is based on infinite repetitions of this sh
45.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
Usually definitions are considered to be finite. Otherwise yes you can just name a number by enumerating its decimals but what's the point. Edit : actually does not even work, courtesy of the Chaitin's numbers
46.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
I am not pretending that banks are perfect. But regulations are made so these situations happen as little as possible. In cryptocurrencies, such frauds and gross mismanagement are called an ordinary Monday.
47.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
Ah, yes, the freedom to invest all your life savings in obvious unregulated scams such as FTX. Cryptocurrencies advocate for a very libertarian point of view: you are the only responsible of your money, and if you get scammed, sucks to be y
48.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
Sure. One example is as follows: each party i generates a random polynomial P_i, and n secret shares of that polynomial (j, P_i(j)) for j in 1..n Then, party i sends (j, P_i(j)) to party j. Party i similarly receives shares (i, P_j(i)) for
49.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
> You lose the utility of network effects, etc Oh yes, you lose a lot of functionalities, but it's not the focus of the computation, simply to estimate, with the current technology, how much it compares to Visa in terms of electrici
50.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
> because you'd be looking at blocks the size of several terabytes in order to fit in global scale transactions. My comparison would rely on running several bitcoin networks in parallel. Of course it does not make sense economically
51.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
A real, complete comparison is impossible as the two systems are fundamentally different and too complicated. What I like with that comparison is remains very simple. If you'd scale BTC to the amount of tx operated by VISA/MC, you
52.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
> It currently uses .1% of global energy ie. about between 300 and a million times more energy than VISA/Mastercard when adjusted to the number of transactions. [0] > It makes use of stranded energy Miners who mine 24/7, by
53.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
Classical numbers for gCO2/kWh do take into account uranium extraction, and yet despite relying heavily on coal as you point out, nuclear (6-12 gCO2/kWh [1]) still remains one of the most competitive power sources [0]. I agree wit
54.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
Complete noob in business/whatever this is, why doesn't this look good?
55.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
There has been some work on the topic, for instance https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/765.pdf But the main issue in provable security is that you're trying to prove real world things with math, and so far we're qu
56.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
I clearly despise academics (and the papers they write) who think that everything should look novel by hiding your thought process. Sadly, especially in fields where conferences are favored over journals, this seems to be common: you only h
57.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
Probably very few or none of them, cryptography getting broken is common. There is no hint that this weakness was introduced on purpose. Now, did the NSA find the attack on their own, kept it secret and hoped for standardization? One can on
58.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
I don't get your point. Cryptography (especially new protocols such as SIKE or anything PQ) must undergo public scrutiny for years or decades, and sometimes get destroyed in the process, that's how it works. Coming up with a usabl
59.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
Another funny example is the one of Juno: a whale Sybil-ed the airdrop, and gathered 10% of the tokens. Then, the community voted to strip the whale of most of their tokens. I find the example interesting because it shows that Layer 2 proto
60.
▲
by
plopilop
4y ago
The massive issue I have with these sources is their reliability. Scotland can produce 98% from wind because they can sell the excess or buy when in deficit from their neighbours who modulate their coal/gas plants. If all its neighbour
More ›