playorizaya

4 ms·

1.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
I'm advocating for a mass hiring event and huge growth push, not throwing together MVPs with LLMs! Big d ck money. Big d ck ROI -- The next great Batman film, a World of Warcraft 2, autonomous robots on the moon, one of those humanoid
2.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
So you’re telling me there’s a chance :D Man I’m sick of Faceboogle! Isn’t anyone else yearning for some je ne sais quoi
3.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
"Photopea: A free Photoshop alternative making millions" – https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33334521 "How Photopea Quietly Beat Adobe into a $2.8M Business" – https://www.linkedin.com/
4.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
LinkedIn was always sooo fake and bad as in it was a living nightmare dystopia some of the shit people would write. I often wondered: Is this how you get promotions? No way does that actually work or do anything... And then I'm like ho
5.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
The ease, extent, and scale at which math integrated with computing along its development makes me wonder if the two fields will effectively enjoin, academically (math and computer programming). Maybe we will look back on today's math
6.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
I was just thinking a "Who is firing?" thread would be more informative than a "Who is hiring?" one in 2026+ That would make this one - "Who is quitting?" the more useful counter to "Who wants to be hired?
7.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
There are opportunities to build a new Google without AI. In that case AI creates an opportunity in an unexpected way. If Google goes all-in on AI, the opportunity is wide open for someone else. And we do see that (Proton, DuckDuckGo, even
8.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
The world runs on garbage code from millions of repos. I agree with you that it doesn't replace a person, but it certainly makes code a lot cheaper. If code is cheaper than ever, and the earning potential is the same. Why aren't i
9.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Exactly - meaning it doesn't replace employees. But here's another thought: Code and pixels are still cheaper than ever before. Another one: The earning potential from code and pixels is the same or greater than it was before AI.
10.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Agree LLMs are more like a calculator than the person who uses it. You actually still need the person to use it! And you want that anyway for accountability and ownership. That's one of the big reasons I think companies should be hoard
11.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Why is there not an AI hiring spree in tech?
12.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Mainly am asking why those with attention (or VCs who can get it) are not introducing more noise, more content, and more clamoring - as you put it. I thought that was the whole idea? Lemon market - maybe - but it remains to be seen IMO. The
13.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
> If you were the kind of person who could create great art, then you would have found a way to make that art happen before LLMs were made. I did some fairly pioneering product and visual design work (early to the trends sorta thing) lon
14.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Yeah depends what/why you wanna do. As a kid I wanted to make games when I got older, I always saw learning to program as a means to that end. It wasn’t until I was deep into my career that I started developing all these preferences an
15.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
> K8s doesn't run containers, container runtime environments do. > K8s sits on top of those and orchestrates them. > I'm not actually interested in debating over the meaning Ok. Did you know that k8s came after containeri
16.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
1. Familiarity with all GL APIs, but deep focus on 1 or 2. If you want to work with Windows, probably DirectX. 2. Make awesome shaders. Check this out: https://fragcoord.xyz I would say being a long-time user of Photoshop and Bl
17.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Nope, I don't think (and don't think I said) it's a VM, or that it can allow you to run any software on any hardware. I have been coding long enough to remember using VirtualBox to do Ruby work for clients :) I may have allud
18.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Kubernetes runs on the infrastructure where your services are deployed. That is not happening here. This is a simulation of a web based kubernetes control plane. The whole point of the movement toward Docker/kubernetes is that you can
19.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Right/Wrong is almost useless in 2026+ People will know they are wrong, but if they are supporting a friend's case or boss's they will choose them over you (naturally) even if you can definitively prove them wrong. There&#x27
20.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
I am not redefining what a port is – but you are No amount of whining is going to change anything. The only thing that would change my opinion is if it actually worked. And I don't think I was being insulting at all. What I replied t
21.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Mostly agree with the timeline. I would say that advertising took over the consumer web ushering in censorship and extreme word policing to satisfy family (ad) friendly content - starting in 2010ish with influencer marketing. (Anyone rememb
22.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
This “port” doesn’t even do that
23.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Save the insults. Make points. mAnY lAyERs aside if it doesn’t actually do anything you have not ported anything. It has to WORK to be a port. See the PlayStation emulator example - same thing. The game itself is not ported but it still run
24.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
It’s like saying you ported PlayStation to the browser but no games work. It would be the most pointless emulator ever. And it wouldn’t qualify as being ported IMO
25.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Imagine if Steam or App Store or Google Play or anybody serious said: "We approved 4 new games today" Dead platform.
26.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
sub optimal for who? ;) A long time ago I was working for a mid tier founder up in Oregon. Pipe dream of a startup, no customers, no product. Money and vision, but no direction and the main problem was that nobody would ever tell him "
27.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Considering what kubernetes actually is - there's a fantastic use case if you really did port it to the browser. So when someone says they did it, I kinda expect that they literally ported that containerization logic to JavaScript. Tha
28.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
To me the interesting part is the use case. To call it a port that doesn’t actually work? Idk seems like a baseline requirement. It’s like saying you ported YouTube to a calculator but it doesn’t play videos because the most interesting par
29.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Sure - but to use another analogy... If someone said they "ported git to the browser" but it was just a UI for git workflows it would be equally misleading. I think because that isn't what "porting" is. In such a ca
30.
by playorizaya 3mo ago
Right, that's what I thought - still very cool! Just a misleading title, I think. It's not "k8s ported to the browser" so much as a web based monitoring tool. Looks great, btw.

More ›