platz

24 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   they are not forever.
2. 212.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   can you even see out the front window with how low the seat is?
3. 213.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   does it matter whether you have a heliocentric or a geocentric worldview when using this method?
4. 214.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   Does he define what a social technology is?
5. 215.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   how does it compare with Taiwan and the work that Audrey Tang has done around democratic technology?
6. 216.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   I maintain that it's possible to identify and extract key points of an article without having to restate the entire article.
7. 217.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   This appears to be one of the core tenets of the article: > Ultimately, though, the popularity of feudal-speak is a testament to intellectual weakness, rather than media savviness. It is as if the left’s theoretical framework can no long
8. 218.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   What if my server is not node.js. This is always the assumption that irks me in GraphQL discussions. Even the blog post author makes it.
9. 219.▲
   by platz 4y ago

   bookmarking server: espial: https://github.com/jonschoning/espial
10. 220.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    > And I got critically hit by his thrown pebble after clapping at a funeral. That sounds epic.
11. 221.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    dentures and crampon are arguably techincal
12. 222.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    I thought it was Infinite Jest.
13. 223.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    I have an even cheaper service for you, an open-source self-hosted bookmarking service (Espial) that can import from pinboard export files. https://github.com/jonschoning/espial
14. 224.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    I think people going to college for filmmaking is different from being a streamer.
15. 225.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    by what mechanism can they directly apply towards the pursuit
16. 226.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    But one of the special-sauce weapons of the West/US is all these people attempting to make a go of it at creative arts which benefits our economy in the long run compared to super-rigid societies that don't encourage experimentati
17. 227.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    > The GOF book came up with the "Observer" pattern, but failed to spot and exploit the duality with iterators. That's an interesting insight - thanks
18. 228.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    hardware scalability isnt the issue, its management/operarions scalability. its being beholden to flaky operators who feud with other operators or end their service.
19. 229.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    so its structured recursion i.e. it reifies recursion into variables that than be passed around and modified instead of being implicit/embedded in the control flow? if so how is that different from Observable streams or event emitters.
20. 230.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    That is a more transparent answer and direct answer, yes. Maybe if you had lead with that sentence, I wouldn't have been inclined to respond. But it also fails to address what I point out below. (as an aside, this answer is also not
21. 231.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    Wall of text, didn't answer the question.
22. 232.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    how is that different from just creating an account not tied to your online identity?
23. 233.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    1) The governance problems of private money are incompatible with democracy and the rule of law. 2) There are irremovable privacy, scalability, and recentralization contradictions at the core of any and all permissionless blockchain solutio
24. 234.▲
    by platz 4y ago

    The observable universe is also disappearing.
25. 235.▲
    by platz 5y ago

    if you read the actual article, dimensionality reduction by PCA does not retain the most important information about the data
26. 236.▲
    by platz 5y ago

    exactly right, barrkel. Did you read the article, hervature?
27. 237.▲
    by platz 5y ago

    Isn't the article in fact saying that the new synthetic features are not good features for training?
28. 238.▲
    by platz 5y ago

    So you basically are saying PCA is a useless procedure. Also, "after a certain point" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentance.
29. 239.▲
    by platz 5y ago

    > 1) Does linearly combining my features make any sense? > 2) Can I think of an explanation for why the linearly combined features could have as simple a relationship to the target as the original features? the article provided a nega
30. 240.▲
    by platz 5y ago

    how is it guaranteed that games do not not end in a draw?