platz

7 ms·

31.
by platz 2y ago
How is a jump realized by Not Gates?
32.
by platz 2y ago
> we have not a single shred of evidence that exceeding Turing computability is possible if your basis that anything that has equal to or less than turing computability is a computer, then everything is a computer.
33.
by platz 2y ago
there is no rational basis for assuming the brain is a "computer" in the same way an intel x86 chip is a "computer" or that the universe is a "computer". Using language in this way without defining terms like
34.
by platz 2y ago
I remember reading something about a data wipe or loss of information from the lab after the outbreak. Anyone remember this?
35.
by platz 2y ago
Isn't employment in the US At-Will anyways?
36.
by platz 2y ago
abstractions never solve problems that couldn't have been solved without them.
37.
by platz 2y ago
the argument isn't that it's expensive to tear them down, it's that a lot of carbon was released to create them, so to tear them down would be wasteful.
38.
by platz 2y ago
oh I made a a typo. Meant "types" OR "bytes"
39.
by platz 2y ago
What is fundamental, types of bytes?
40.
by platz 2y ago
Oh, well I guess If you're OK that's all that matters. What's the point of anecdotes if the subject is about statistics.
41.
by platz 2y ago
Wouldn't you be on the 324 degree radial
42.
by platz 2y ago
are you sure https://www.espn.com/boston/mlb/news/story?id=4524957
43.
by platz 2y ago
not suitable = better-than-average?
44.
by platz 2y ago
I don't believe we live in such epistemic black holes. how do you know you're not a brain in a vat. all we know is that we probably aren't a brain in a vat. hah.
45.
by platz 2y ago
> Can AI apply knowledge learned in one topic to another topic We don't have AGI yet. and AGI will have deception just about by definition anyway, so the point is moot.
46.
by platz 2y ago
is murder the only bad thing in your mind? can things be bad without being the worst possible thing? what i'm hearing: its bad but it's not bad because there are worse things that are bad and also I'm "looking the other
47.
by platz 2y ago
when you consider morality, do you think your rule only ever applies to one person or categorically?
48.
by platz 2y ago
so stealing is ok if it's from the wealthy and corporations..
49.
by platz 3y ago
Despite the horrors portrayed in the article, I'm disturbed that every critical comment here was flagged and is dead.
50.
by platz 3y ago
429 Too Many Requests = no images lololololol
51.
by platz 3y ago
I thought the docs themselves were a work of conceptual art i.e. the docs themselves were "dadaist" and were the main point of the site
52.
by platz 3y ago
How will I have any expectations of run-time behavior if I have to hope that my graph will fuse or fail to fuse at run time? Reminds me of the issues that haskell programmers face when an innocuous change causes list fusion to fail tanking
53.
by platz 3y ago
why on earth would you want/allow people to add comments on your link/landing page
54.
Ask HN: Who is still using PureScript?
2 points by platz 3y ago|1 comments
55.
by platz 3y ago
explain matrix functions in more detail and how computing a matrix function on an upper triangular matrix is an advantage. how is this a fundamental tenet of numerical linear algebra? also, if I just want the Eigendecomposition, why do I ne
56.
by platz 3y ago
"Advanced" ovestates the content a bit, since they are covering functors, "Monads I" and difference lists as core content.
57.
by platz 3y ago
what considerations are the between choosing parser combinators and using a parser generator?
58.
by platz 3y ago
how do you direct what the network learns if it all comes from supervised learning training sets? How do you insert rules that aren't learned into what weights are learned?
59.
by platz 3y ago
thanks, hope you're doing OK bud
60.
by platz 3y ago
The objective data is the greenness of the earth measured by satellites. the article offers multiple possible explanations for this and what their effects might be. it acknowledges those derivative outcomes are speculative.

More ›