Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
plaidfuji
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
plaidfuji
4mo ago
> The first requirement is that the computer program has a body (either physical or virtual) and sense organs Ok, deploy a local model on a lightweight edge compute device and strap it to a chassis with wheels, and attach a cheap webcam
32.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
To put that in perspective, if you assume a token is 4 bytes, that’s about 164 MB/s of traffic, which sounds a bit less staggering.
33.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
> Altman’s realization was born partially out of an experiment of his own. He tried delegating his Slack and email responses to AI, then began responding to some again manually. Well I’ll be..
34.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
There may be additional major leaps forward, and there may not. I kind of struggle to imagine what the next step actually is. Certainly there will be improvements in performance (speed) and cost. But at a point you reach a barrier where the
35.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
Our shop is forced to use Copilot on gov cloud, and it’s so useless I usually stick to manually coding. Its syntax is messy, it randomly combines lines together, flips order, or drops a couple tokens worth of output in the middle of a line,
36.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
kind of sobering to realize that whether your job can be profitably automated away comes down to what $/token some hyperscale AI provider can deliver… I suppose it’s nice that this article highlights some upward pressure on that number
37.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
It’s the exact same mental gymnastics that cause people to accuse model providers of large-scale plagiarism. That is to say, not that much gymnastics. Like a cartwheel at most.
38.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
This comment couldn’t be more ironic given the content of the post
39.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
If I’m understanding this correctly, it starts by raising this question, then argues that it’s kind of a cheap and meaningless punch-down. I’m not sure I completely agree.. I think these types of questions are more a response to the level o
40.
▲
by
plaidfuji
5mo ago
They offered him two free hour-long rides to their facility and back just to pick up the suitcase? Waymo trouble than it’s worth
41.
▲
by
plaidfuji
6mo ago
It’s all moral relativism
42.
▲
by
plaidfuji
6mo ago
> Teams is where most enterprise work happens: decisions get made, customers get answered, and projects move forward there. … and Teams is where it will stay! Microsoft’s piss-poor integrability across its productivity suite is the singl
43.
▲
by
plaidfuji
6mo ago
No, you’d remark that your house has appreciated in value over the past 20 years. But you wouldn’t have realized any of that gain until you sold the house - the point being that the realization is the actual taxable event, which is why it m
44.
▲
by
plaidfuji
6mo ago
> SpaceX's valuation only makes sense if It’s funny, I hear the exact same phrasing used when justifying Tesla’s valuation. “It only makes sense if…” … if you ignore what the actual, physical business does today, and picture it doin
45.
▲
by
plaidfuji
7mo ago
Came here to quote the same sentence, but say the exact opposite - it seems to me that today’s LLMs are progressing far faster on the “thinking” front than the “doing”. I suppose it depends on your definition of “doing” - if it’s “writing c
46.
▲
by
plaidfuji
7mo ago
Besides being a very interesting conceptual exercise, the animated figures in this article are absolutely stunning - best I’ve ever seen.
47.
▲
by
plaidfuji
7mo ago
I agree, but it is still very unfortunate. It’s a lot less compelling to argue “but we killed fewer civilians, and it was only on accident”
48.
▲
by
plaidfuji
7mo ago
China is the world’s largest fossil fuel importer, so this is a case where their economic incentives align with global environmental trends. I suspect they would be trying to do this regardless of whether global warming were a problem. And
49.
▲
by
plaidfuji
7mo ago
If this turns out to be true, which seems increasingly likely day by day, this will be the humanitarian price against which the rest of the campaign will be measured. The US will have ceded much of the moral high ground they claimed in aven
50.
▲
by
plaidfuji
7mo ago
This story is now being carried by WSJ.. the likelihood that it’s real only seems to grow each day. If true, this will be the humanitarian price the war is measured against, assuming the casualties don’t grow further.
51.
▲
by
plaidfuji
7mo ago
> Analysis of the area shows the school is in a middle of a military area full of IRGC bases. Isn’t the far more likely explanation here that they (Israel / US) tried to strike an IRGC base and missed?
52.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
The key difference is that Anthropic aired their disagreement with the DoD publicly, and the DoD is not going to work with a company that tries to exert any amount of control over their relationship via the public sphere. Same goes for Trum
53.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
> Minimally lethal “Israel strikes two schools in Iran, killing more than 80 people” https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/2/28/israel-strikes-... Welp, better luck next time
54.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
If this spreads into a broader conflict, it remains to be seen whether Europe sticks tightly with that block. They certainly won’t align with Russia, but they may be tied so closely to China economically that they can’t afford to be dragged
55.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
Yeah… turns out you have to keep a certain balance of domestic industries to keep 350 million people employed in a capacity where they don’t want to burn down the whole system. But that would be socialism. Now you’ve got the people whose jo
56.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
My first thought as well - they suddenly realized they have an interest in AI not cannibalizing their existing SaaS portfolio
57.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
Sounds like the update is mostly system prompt + changes to orchestration / tool use around the core model, if the knowledge cutoff is unchanged
58.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
I suspect this may be the case. There’s inherent inefficiency in having a human forced to translate everything into context for the LLM. You don’t get the full benefit until you allow it to be fully plugged in.
59.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
This is the biggest bottleneck. To realize the “replacement of white collar workers” fever dream, (which is, I still believe, technically feasible), you need the agent that replaces them to have all of the context they had. All of the email
60.
▲
by
plaidfuji
8mo ago
Interesting idea. I do feel one of the major barriers to mass replacement of white collar workers is lack of direct integration between email/slack and LLMs. A human still needs to distill organizational needs from multiple stakeholder
More ›