pkingolfsson

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by pkingolfsson 6y ago

   This approach has yielded us Icelandair's with fewer idiots therefore no baseless claims for lawsuit. You see.. they fall into these boiling pools of mud. Problem solved.
2. 2.▲
   by pkingolfsson 6y ago

   Also should we just rely on nuclear because it’s accessible technology to us right now? We need new forms of energy creation, accepting nuclear energy as our defacto power source will be equivalent to our ancestors choosing coal when lookin
3. 3.▲
   by pkingolfsson 6y ago

   This is not equivalent in terms of risk assessment. One broken product does not endanger environmental ecosystems or countries at the same scale as nuclear. Bear in mind that this was a pretty routine earthquake that is still causing issues
4. 4.▲
   by pkingolfsson 6y ago

   It’s quite simple, most other ways of energy creation does not yield hazardous waste. I’m referring to motion and geothermal. You tell me how wind energy danger is compared to nuclear? How is nuclear energy a sustainable energy source in un
5. 5.▲
   by pkingolfsson 6y ago

   We don’t need it. We all saw how this ended in Japan, Fukushima and how they haven’t even figured basic stuff out. See recent article on BBC here: https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-asia-54566978