pkese

3 ms·

1.
by pkese 9y ago
Do note, that some functional languages have good out-of-the-box support for both backend and frontend. An this is not negligible. I'm using F# which in combination with Fable (F#->.js transpiler) lets me really quickly share code,
2.
by pkese 9y ago
So far I've used F# form smaller projects, basically anywhere there's any un-trivial problem. Just the fact that the editor helps you write correct and concise code means that once you correct the mistakes that the editor (Ionide)
3.
by pkese 9y ago
It might be worth also looking into ReasonML, which is a very similar language, but gets some of F# issues right, like: - Targeting native compilation and javascript transpilation out of the box - Proper functionally architected libra
4.
by pkese 9y ago
I think the main problem is that F# never went beyond .Net platform (e.g. they never released a native compiler). .Net is nice and gets the work done, but the fact that existing .Net libraries are OOP style means 1) they don't fit as n
5.
by pkese 9y ago
Funny. I'm also love Linux, but for me, the combination of .Net Core/Standard, Visual Studio Code and Ionide provide by far the best programming toolset/experience of anything I have ever seen in my 30 year programming career
6.
by pkese 11y ago
RxJS has a steep learning curve and is quite hard to really understand beyond basic examples that fit on a presentation slide. It might be a great tool for really smart developers, but I wouldn't share any large RxJS code in a develope
7.
Amazon Web Services presentation with video & slides(videolectures.net)
2 points by pkese 18y ago|0 comments