pixl97

11 ms·

211.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>We cant even verify if these fields are real though We can perform casual experiments that are falsifiable against them. This is the scientific definition of real within a probabilistic framework.
212.
by pixl97 1mo ago
There are two questions about that stability I have. One, things like catastrophic forgetting and falling into incoherence. Two, less likely but far more worrying, falling into unwanted attractor states. For example greed, powerseeking, bea
213.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Ah yes, just what people want, 50,000 posts about your AI setup on HN. Concentrating certain types of information can be useful. You don't go to an encyclopedia looking for a recepie.
214.
by pixl97 1mo ago
What environment would stay at a constant 97 degrees?
215.
by pixl97 1mo ago
A lot of that old furniture was also very expensive stuff.
216.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>larger amount of inexpensive high quality furniture on the second hand market, There is no second hand market, it's just a used primary market. Before the invention of the internet getting rid of second hand items meant tossing it,
217.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>Also, it's better to donate than to dispose Aka, trash by proxy. Best to look up what people actually need. There is a lot of this junk we collect that just gets junked by the donation groups turning into a cost center.
218.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>I for one am fairly surprised that what I think is the valid anger among the US working While surprising it should be too surprising. 1930-1945 was another example of this happening.
219.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Looking back at the beginning of the 1900s and now there are a lot of meta level parallels. Too much change is happening too quickly for societies to realistically adapt. This leaves a lot of room for greedy agents to gather other power see
220.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Tell your providers to stop building workspaces with conflicting identifiers and namespaces.
221.
by pixl97 1mo ago
"Goddammit, I'm wholly dependent on Merriam-Webster, what ever am I going to do".
222.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>Continuous learning is exciting stuff! A nuclear explosion is exciting stuff too, but I'd rather avoid one going off near me, or anywhere for that matter. I can't think of any reason why continuous learning won't mostly l
223.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>If we run into a real physical problem today, can we just have AI invent the math on the spot to solve the problem without a human having done the theoretical math in the past? This depends on unanswered questions on what math actually
224.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Climate change and killer drones run amok on the surface doesn't actually seem that far fetched now.
225.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>AI didnt break through stavier-nokes until a human set the initial direction. That's not going to change. Why isn't this going to change? Right now it's easy to see why don't set AI lose on every problem, someone hum
226.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>Everything therefore becomes a hobby or a game. Already predicted. How much Whuffie you got? https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/8086
227.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean, why don't you ask them for unfiltered models and a few billion tokens?
228.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Actually there are people attempting to find new math via biological entities. Cells and such. The interesting thing here is it is easily falsifiable even though working at these scales is still insanely hard. Take the golden rule for examp
229.
by pixl97 1mo ago
The difference between science and woo is science makes falsifiable predictions. I mean, go back 500 years. Tell everyone that everything is actually make of fields (no not the kind you grow things in). These fields manifest waves that carr
230.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Are you talking about god as being, or god as a concept?
231.
by pixl97 1mo ago
> but sentient universe is fairy tale. Ehhhhh.... this is actually a much bigger claim than you realize and to immediately dismiss it leads to some problematic issues in the continuum of reality. Without a rigorous falsifiable definition
232.
by pixl97 1mo ago
The question is what exactly is continuous. The quantum fields themselves? And we have no evidence the the quantum fields are discrete quantum states themselves, but the particles they produce appear otherwise. It's always possible tha
233.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I think Michael Levin is also doing work around platonic math being a thing that exists moreso than an actual concept. His work is related to biologies discovery of algorithms, the complexity levels of simple algorithms, and n-order effects
234.
by pixl97 1mo ago
> They could sometimes admit that women were oppressed (but only by “the system”) As the saying goes, when you're privileged equality feels like oppression.
235.
by pixl97 1mo ago
A tale as old as time.
236.
by pixl97 1mo ago
It is distinctly likely that visibility and general reasoning at humanlike speed and efficiency is impossible. That is reasoning at the token level and at the meta level don't have a one to one representation that can be interpreted wh
237.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>What's with all this make believe delusional bullshit? The LLM is not gonna wake up and become AI. Get real guys. Look, it's one of those human stochastic parrots that just randomly repeats shit without understanding anything.
238.
by pixl97 1mo ago
This is a weird contextual failure on your part. Not all companies have a concentration of power. The government has no mutual interest in those companies. Now, when you talk about things in the F100 the situation changes drastically. If y
239.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>eans the government is their main customer and stakeholder, and shield them from liability, governance, and openness I personally believe they already have this, why would the current government at least want to formalize this when it c
240.
by pixl97 1mo ago
It's interesting the cyberpunk-esque future we're sliding into. Things like cognito-hazards and information-hazards are legitimately discussed and researched problems we're experiencing. It's going to be interesting on h

More ›