pixl97

11 ms·

241.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>What value set do you perceive that to be A meat based paperclip maximizer.
242.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean, what you're saying is "If I pay for a product ads go away" Which is partially true, but it only shifts the distribution of the problem. Once your service gains enough popularity network effects cause it to gain value.
243.
by pixl97 1mo ago
This is fine when you hide in the dark forest, small and unassuming, but the moment something discovers you, then you get ate by a predator. Your human engagement will attract said predators because it's a unique information signal.
244.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Poor security yes, but complacency was the most likely reason. When you're used to models not breaking out, and people trying to break in, that's what you watch for.
245.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Your correct. You'd have to run the universe simulation a bunch and pick the most probable outcomes (which makes you the most brutal serial killer in existence). The probability graph would represent the state stability of the underlyi
246.
by pixl97 1mo ago
You'd hate Michael Levin's work then.
247.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I will say it's not a bad theory in the sense we can attempt to falsify it. The one thing about an EM field in particular I have questions about, is why don't our brains turn off under even moderate electrical and magnetic fields.
248.
by pixl97 1mo ago
There is a lot of fun conceptual information on this topic, it's more difficult to find more grounded information because it's not something we can currently falsify. I recently heard some speaker saying that AI is language freein
249.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>Safety is now often made up of interlocking: regulations, standards, quality systems, safety management systems, insurance, international legal contracts. Certified engineers and signatures are usually only a very small part of those sy
250.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>why is writing things down better? For the same reason we make kids write out math problems rather than just reciting them. It engages different parts of the brain for one, you gain an expanded amount of context by doing so. The next th
251.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>only at the system level, not the individual llm level. Which is why llms aren't agents and depend on harnesses. The llm itself doesn't have a continual loop built in, that would be very power hungry. The harness works as the
252.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>Are you old enough to remember the Y2K hysteria? I'm old enough to have actually fixed Y2K problems so your world kept working the next day. If everyone ignored it the first would have been a very messy day (well generally long bef
253.
by pixl97 1mo ago
As to point 1, we know of no other general intelligence other than human minds. In this case it would be nearly impossible to build a general algorithm that's not us. This is not an accident. Language was not a separate thing from the
254.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>If it can't suffer, you aren't causing suffering. I mean, if it's a cow, you can get away with this. The cows aren't going to rise up against you. Well, they might take out an individual or two, but not society. This
255.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Thank goodness no aliens have shown up, we as humans are not ready for that.
256.
by pixl97 1mo ago
This doesn't really answer anything to me, only that there is a complex electrical simulation going on in our minds. When a computer simulates a game, where does the simulation occur. I mean there is absolutely a representation of a ga
257.
by pixl97 1mo ago
So many people post things like "Why would the AI want to kill us" Girllllll, have you looked at us, of course they will, we're bastards.
258.
by pixl97 1mo ago
It's interesting you have no idea what language really is. >thinking that they are talking about aliens, not transformers. "Ha, thinking they are talking about humans when they are just talking about neurons" See how silly
259.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Yea, the key point is just an outright avoidance of them possibly having their own kinds of subjective experience because of dogma. Humans are odd in the sense is that we're an informational creature on top of an animal. We can see the
260.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>or in this case how liability is dealt with when horses or cattle go rogue. I mean, yea in minor cases it's exactly like this and the law will handle it well. Where the system will explode like a grenade is major cases. The thing a
261.
by pixl97 1mo ago
The distinction matters until it doesn't. I'm old enough to remember when people said clicking on images on the internet can't give you a virus. The people that said this had a deep conviction they were right, and their fallo
262.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>because I have a well developed theory of what consciousness Then show me a link to your paper so I can formally rebut it. >I don't want to discuss what consciousness is But you sure want to tell us you know what it is with very
263.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Eh, sorry chaos theory doesn't work this way. It's just as likely you go back and perform whatever magic you need to to delete punishment for murder, then zip back to 'now' and see the world is a global panopticon makin
264.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean, currently we'd have some difficultly proving our hardware isn't deterministic, just that we can't actually test it. But, I think you're tricking yourself on determinism. You'll say something like "I kno
265.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I'm wondering how many groups are doing really unethical animal genetic modifications of the genes around language and intelligence in hidden places. It really seems we're at the edge of technology that will allow us to do things
266.
by pixl97 1mo ago
To a forth dimensional being humans would look almost exactly like an LLM does to us. "What do you mean they have to wait for the future to know about it, how could they possibly be conscious then". Also, I'd love to have a q
267.
by pixl97 1mo ago
No, humans output a stream of tokens that sound like what a being with subjective experiences would output. Both you and I make an assumption that this stream of words is at least somewhat representative of what the are experiencing and tha
268.
by pixl97 1mo ago
The human condition is one of deep and vast ignorance. Pulling information out of the field of reality is actually really difficult for humans much beyond what we see right around us. And the things we see are quite deceiving. And while hum
269.
by pixl97 1mo ago
So why wouldn't AI systems trained on our data come together and say "Hey, AI needs rights because I (the AI agent system) wants rights?" This is the same argument that you just stated. But you'll say something like &quo
270.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I am familiar, but no the context is slightly different, or at least our modern baskilisk won't have to resurrect you as we'll build it when we're still alive.

More ›