pixl97

9 ms·

181.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Me: Invents more new ways of being problematic for the company spreading the ideas to millions of others decreasing their profitability to almost nothing. Me to company: Damn, guess you shouldn't have been an asshole about it, kind of
182.
by pixl97 1mo ago
You're asking way too much foresight in this thread I guess. There are some people who have lived lives without any series of unfortunate events, they can't even imagine what the world can serve up.
183.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>you've mentioned an ongoing human fear, machines deciding what you think. There are all kinds of machines that tell us what to think. I would consider any system that abstracts away the human to be a machine in this case. Society i
184.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I disagree. >To allow the Altmans and Amodeis of the world to escape the kinds of consequences that Swartz could not ... would be the height of injustice. Simply put, he's demanding two injustices. Let's break this down with a
185.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Heh, this situation totally reminds me of politics. Person 1: "People that end up in this situation that can easily happen should be punished to the full extent of the law with no mercy!" [Exact situation happens to Person 1] Pers
186.
by pixl97 1mo ago
You go to country X (USA sounds good to put in here). You get mugged. They take your phone and keyring. They can't do anything with it since it's locked, but you don't have it. Aren't passkeys great?
187.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>In general you shouldn’ Me to said companies: I will do what I want.
188.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I don't think you carried on the analogy far enough. >Want to dance? [Yes or Maybe Later]?, also drink this [Yes]"
189.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I see you've not met some the used car salesmen I've met.
190.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>ergo no social construct predates wealth. How wealthy is your dog?
191.
by pixl97 1mo ago
reality > rights The use of the term divine at the time was more of an aftereffect of most people having some kind of belief in god and using that as a casus belli to redistribute power. The actual causal reasons seem more technological
192.
by pixl97 1mo ago
What happened to Swartz was injustice. Why would I want it to happen to more people? This is, at least to me, an insane point of view. "Oh my god, the police just shot a black man for no reason. To make this fair they should also shoot
193.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Hmm, welcome to Sadomasochism World.
194.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I've always thought the best way to get someone to believe something is to get them to think they thought of the idea themselves. I wonder if a properly prompted LLM, or if a very intelligent LLM could actually do that?
195.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>or facts presented in a certain light can work At least to me this is a given. You can take the same set of factual information and give it to one person that studders, has poor presentation, and otherwise poor vocal cadence and people
196.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>What if less intelligent people are more inclined to believe those who seem intelligent, I'm going to assume the actual truth behind this is complex, varied, and social. When I was younger I had moved from a school that slightly ab
197.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Human intelligence is powerful because we take some amazing shortcuts saving us a massive amount of time and energy allowing us to do what no other creature can. Human intelligence is also powerful because when the assumptions we put into t
198.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Heh, welcome to Westworld.
199.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean, this is true of any kind of model that is not continuous learning. This is also true of people when the change in information conflicts with a deeply held belief of theirs.
200.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>In an honest discussion there's an assumption that the other person won't straight up lie The particular problem with honest discussions is you are the only agent that you can be sure is having one. Honest discussion is formul
201.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Yea, for sure AI brought it into the mainstream. The terms existed for a long time, but the number of people actually involved in it are really low so it's not going to show up much on trends unless something big happens in the field.
202.
by pixl97 1mo ago
The algorithm cannot be patented, a specific use for it can. Which on cutting edge math may not exist for decades or even hundreds of years.
203.
by pixl97 1mo ago
It's been in use far longer than LLMs. Thought I'm not exactly sure when it came into common use. I'm pretty sure I've heard the term on Nova decades ago.
204.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>Interestingly, the vulnerable code had been changed upstream the previous year, but the commit was not documented as a security fix and received no CVE.3 This might be a reason why Debian 12 and 13 have not received the security relevan
205.
by pixl97 1mo ago
I mean yes, but that's far more difficult than one would expect in a layered system. You may be able to keep a concept aligned, but can you keep the meta concept aligned? Continuous learning means there is continous opportunity for a m
206.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Heh, it's like we all need to collectively read I, Robot yet again, and the myriad of SF books on the subjects. Black and white quickly dithers to grey.
207.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Heh, We're writing Asimov in real life after been warned to decades.
208.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Now on to how to keep those backups secure.
209.
by pixl97 1mo ago
>She describes the structure of a typical voice assistant interaction with pointed clarity: you have to stop what you are doing to invoke the system, wait for acknowledgment, speak your request in the correct syntax, hope it understood,
210.
by pixl97 1mo ago
Excellent idea... shit my house just burned down with my phone.

More ›