pishpash

14 ms·

241.
by pishpash 2y ago
I think you overlook how algorithms come about. How does GPT write novel code, which are algorithms?
242.
by pishpash 2y ago
Psychology is cognitive. Doesn't seem principled to discard that at all.
243.
by pishpash 2y ago
Why is a deterministic algorithm not reasoning? Reasoning is very deterministic.
244.
by pishpash 2y ago
Nah, human failures look equally nonsensical. You're just more attuned to use their body language or peer judgement to augment your reception. Really psychotic humans can bypass this check.
245.
by pishpash 2y ago
Would be good to put equivalent grades on LLM's then. Instead of GPT-4o, it's GPT-11th grade.
246.
by pishpash 2y ago
More than that, "ruliad" is complete vacuous, too. "All possible rules applied to all possible states infinitely many times", like, every possible theory, including the right one is in it, ok... thanks for defining this
247.
by pishpash 2y ago
As usual with Wolfram, too hand-wavy. It could be true but this is not serious physics.
248.
by pishpash 2y ago
Whoever is using it as digital gold certainly sees economic value, e.g. preserving wealth to invest elsewhere.
249.
by pishpash 2y ago
News sections are outsourced to AP's essaybots.
250.
by pishpash 2y ago
The only thing that comes to mind is maybe defense co. has experience building with indestructible materials, and the specs are for lasting 50 years, which when amortized is optimal for an entity like the government that can dump huge amoun
251.
by pishpash 2y ago
None have huge windows like this. Are the tasks that different?
252.
by pishpash 2y ago
Will these not roll over easily?
253.
by pishpash 2y ago
Uh, for as long as they work? That used to be the support model norm before this disposable software/disposable hardware culture from the 2000's.
254.
by pishpash 2y ago
It's a psychological game. People are primed to want new things, and more investment into something old is hard to justify even if it's financially right. Also OS's lose supprt, softwares bloat, and bundled offers from carrie
255.
by pishpash 2y ago
Certainly Gemini for Google suites has been useless so far.
256.
by pishpash 2y ago
That's why you use it for summarization or transformation not expansion.
257.
by pishpash 2y ago
That's how people move on too.
258.
by pishpash 2y ago
Wire transfer is not really the point. It became a topic because that was posed as an "instant" way to get money out of a brokerage. I pointed out it isn't always reliable and that unreliability is a symptom of a real liquidi
259.
by pishpash 2y ago
Keep some funds in a marginable brokerage account attached to a major bank, one with physical locations. That way if you really need funds immediately during banking hours you're good to go.
260.
by pishpash 2y ago
Lots of reasons, joint accounts, name mismatch, weird names, fat finger by bank employee, missing odd info deemed necessary by the receiving bank, fraud/money laundering holds. One of my very normal wire transfers of not even a huge am
261.
by pishpash 2y ago
You need to get the money to an actual bank, an extra hop is just extra delay and cause for problems. See links to examples of failed wire transfer below.
262.
by pishpash 2y ago
Read and learn: https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/lhrr49/cha... https://www.reddit.com/r/fidelityinvestments/comments/1ctpz8...
263.
by pishpash 2y ago
Wire can easily get held up for unknown amounts of time with no recourse. A brokerage attached to a real bank is the only liquid solution for large amounts. Everything else is on an ACH timeframe, which is usually next day with push, but th
264.
by pishpash 2y ago
For daily life yes, for large amounts of money, the extra layer due to not being a real bank makes a huge difference.
265.
by pishpash 2y ago
It's standard trolling technique, or maybe rhetorical art to win an argument, your call. Now you have a pointless thread five deep.
266.
by pishpash 2y ago
Usually sites redirect you to another site with a modal heavily disclaiming that they are in any way related or responsible for content. If Disney did not do that and it's on their site then sure they use the CDA backstop if they can
267.
by pishpash 2y ago
That's disingenuous. Menu being on Disney's website makes Disney more than a landlord, more like a service provider. Is Disney responsible for what's on its site or not? What if the menu had some hate speech or terrorism?
268.
by pishpash 2y ago
The plaintiff is arguing an equally absurd notion, that because they are suing on behalf of the estate, the estate never signed up for Disney+ because it didn't exist before the death. So you know, it's all absurdity vs absurdity.
269.
by pishpash 2y ago
What media format are the onion rings?
270.
by pishpash 2y ago
Come be dishwashers in the fancy kitchen! You can only have one chef after all and the line cook positions are filled long ago too, but dishes don't wash themselves.

More ›