Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pishpash
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
59 ms
·
901.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
You're overthinking it, it's some PM justifying his or her own job in a company flush with so much cash it doesn't know what to do with it.
902.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
It is as much a choice as installing an .exe. Treat the web browser like the OS of old, because that's exactly what browser makers think of it.
903.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
What is "it"? This is an allegation. Under an administration with a highly motivated agenda. Could be true, or could be completely fabricated/exaggerated like all the national security allegations this administration has thro
904.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
That and laggy keystrokes are really a productivity killer, but maybe for some people it's a worthwhile tradeoff. Not for me. I'm of the opinion that tools should get out of the way and be almost invisible.
905.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
JetBrains makes your machine sound like a jet with the CPU fan, that's for sure.
906.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Then you'd be a seller. They buy bulk on Alibaba, store it in near warehouses (FBA) and parcel out single sales at a higher price.
907.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Or returned the $2 once the 1 star review was left.
908.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
If so then why would VC's fund new competitors? The answer is they would not. VC's may throw their free money at new unquantifiable opportunities, but for this niche the financials will have become well known. In other words there
909.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
It's not about subsidies as a business model so much as a war of capital attrition with weaker competitors, which is necessarily not endless.
910.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
You underestimate what you can extract from making the market larger and more efficient, which taxis could never do. Why don't people barter instead of paying huge sums to Wall Street to intermediate?
911.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Dumb TV's had ports forever. How else would people have connected their video sources?
912.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Planned obsolescence is a feature. Not an accident.
913.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
You just solved your own problem. Don't buy a TV, buy a monitor. (Some people also buy projectors.)
914.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Welcome to MBA-run tech.
915.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
But all of this is separable: storage at home, transport/computing provided by Google. So security and trust verification can come from Google (or any other provider) but emails stay home. Or photo processing provided by Google, but ph
916.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
It's high time for somebody to make an appliance running open protocols that behaves like cloud applications but that is owned and hosted at one's home. Maybe it's what NAS is turning into, but open, and more broadly conceive
917.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
What a weird era when we record everything but also let it all get deleted/not be looked at. Maybe curation-on-creation was the right model after all.
918.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Never trust cloud providers for archival data I think is the lesson. Keep your own storage for that.
919.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
How is "inactive" defined? Maybe they're really going after people who create accounts primarily for free additional storage.
920.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
I think the main issue is storage Moore's law has really hit a wall and it is no longer the case that the data Google stores grows slower than storage per dollar like in the early days. Google's freebie business model is going to
921.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
There used to be a time when you ran development/debugger on a different machine than the one running the application. Developers having fast machines for work should have absolutely nothing to do with not properly testing for user env
922.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
The thing with scaledowns is that scaledowns usually never happens. It also costs money to build scaledown logic and build around elastic resources.
923.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
#1: The writing's on the wall for x86, probably. Once its former monopoly rent is only justified by high-end "scientific computing" uses -- well you know what happened to IBM/DEC/SGI/HP and their workstation so
924.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Start by hiring good people that you don't need "legibility" from. Or fire managers who have no real use other than to "read".
925.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Correlative methods are the wrong model by themselves but could be one part of the right model. Cognition happens by correlation, but also by denoising, by adaptive filtering, by interference cancellation, even by predictive generation. Lis
926.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
There is an equivalent problem in audio, which is source localization. That's much simpler than note cognition.
927.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
If anyone bothered to click the link, it's not MIDI but MIDI-generated audio (title should be changed). They used MIDI audio because likely it simplified the problem along a number of dimensions: rhythm and timbre are fixed, and there
928.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
It would have probably died due to the skull not fitting the larger brain.
929.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
It shouldn't even be a "hard" problem any more. Search and relevance are mature technologies. You do need to provide some features, but there are many: time spent interacting with tabs, was it a "terminus" in a navi
930.
▲
by
pishpash
6y ago
Acquiring fewer things is not mutually exclusive with not discarding things. They may even be positively correlated.
More ›