pishpash

64 ms·

931.
by pishpash 6y ago
That's exactly my point, it happens automatically by relevance ("how many times did it get recently refreshed"). It's not you going in to actively close out memory "tabs". All your "tabs" are open.
932.
by pishpash 6y ago
It's actually abnormal to actively throw away things. It's not how the brain works. Do you actively try to "forget" things? Very rarely. We only need to throw away physical objects due to space constraints and rearrangem
933.
by pishpash 6y ago
Maybe this should be formalized, like automatically get open tabs into easily searchable persistent storage, whether they are called Bookmarks or not. Then they can be closed by prompting to "clean up". Maybe even skip that manual
934.
by pishpash 6y ago
This has definitely been available for more than a year, but no more than about ten, from my memory. Edit: Looks like it started in 2013, under Meg Whitman. [1] Also, this user says it was ad-sponsored! [2] [1] https://www.ther
935.
by pishpash 6y ago
Not even close. Second law of thermodynamics puts a limit on heat engine. Gravity storage is not subject to such limit. But it is a great idea to burn any fuel whose oxidized product is not a gas. The only reason why burning hydrocarbons is
936.
by pishpash 6y ago
Why would you rage-anything? List it again or offer it to the second highest bidder. (If you really wanted you can probably successfully collect on the winning buyer but it may not be worth it.)
937.
by pishpash 6y ago
This, just because you're the one rear-ended doesn't mean you bear no fault, although you have some presumptions in your favor. Indeed, the quotation itself plainly argues for front-vehicle "antagonistic motive" in the o
938.
by pishpash 6y ago
CALPERS isn't CA, pretty simple.
939.
by pishpash 6y ago
If the government regulates everything about the company why is it not at least partly responsible?
940.
by pishpash 6y ago
Do that enough times and nobody will invest in California's anything.
941.
by pishpash 6y ago
I read the comment and find no such implication.
942.
by pishpash 6y ago
That's naive. If they didn't want it to be a pure source of revenue they would have structured it that way. You can solve these misaligned incentives by requiring behavioral fines be revenue neutral: you get an annual pro rata r
943.
by pishpash 6y ago
That's too bad, such a simulator would be great for intuition.
944.
by pishpash 6y ago
They are indeed incompetent, since a large chunk of competent people won't go there any more. But what kind of financial voodoo is keeping them afloat? Is it another Sears in waiting?
945.
by pishpash 6y ago
They generate money which people can spend, so if that's the only criterion for wealth (it isn't), then mindlessly printing money is also useful to society (it isn't).
946.
by pishpash 6y ago
Prokaryotes depend on the existence of complex structures (the world outside) to replicate themselves. Yours is not a good example. That aside, people have argued that the viral particle is like a gamete, which is also an incomplete stage o
947.
by pishpash 6y ago
Nonpayment doesn't usually terminate contracts. In fact it may be a breach.
948.
by pishpash 6y ago
It comes down to money. Maybe corporates will have more money to throw at bots, or maybe consumers will have more money in aggregate to throw at bots.
949.
by pishpash 6y ago
Or just information would be sufficient. I'd like to know the walkthrough for backing out of a contract as experienced by an actual person before I sign.
950.
by pishpash 6y ago
This bug has been around forever and of course it's a likely wontfix for Google. https://android.stackexchange.com/questions/209777/drive-sen...
951.
by pishpash 6y ago
This sounds like something that should be followed up with placebo experiments.
952.
by pishpash 6y ago
You can shut down anything with sufficient justification, the issues is this app is primarily for speech and the bar is correspondingly high. It would be the same if it were a newspaper or a conference, rather than a casino, where surely sp
953.
by pishpash 6y ago
Maybe because mobile Chrome refuses to support extensions for fear of adblock killing the golden goose?
954.
by pishpash 6y ago
Google doesn't only kill unpopular things. If it did, you can depend on those things that have already become popular by not being an early adopter, which then becomes a chicken-and-egg problem that at least provides some strategic lev
955.
by pishpash 6y ago
So let's see that first. But get in line behind DC residents and Puerto Ricans.
956.
by pishpash 6y ago
Well isn't that convenient? Whenever it's a commercial problem it cannot be a speech problem, according to you.
957.
by pishpash 6y ago
> Why limit the interpretation of free speech to the US constitution? Because that's literally what the grandparent asked. You appear to have a completely different question.
958.
by pishpash 6y ago
Sure they can. They communicate using it. They have rights.
959.
by pishpash 6y ago
Your McCarthyist fear and paranoia and the President's cynical manipulation of the same don't trump people's First Amendment rights. The court upheld that principle, thankfully.
960.
by pishpash 6y ago
They can show the court in private. What it can't be is "trust us" because that's a wide gaping loophole.

More ›